Ad is loading...
NSBCX vs RWMFX
NSBCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NSBCX vs RWMFX
Nuveen Dividend Growth C
Price$56.83
Change-$1.48 (-2.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.84B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$58.07
Change-$1.68 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets180.96B
NSBCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSBCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSBCX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 181B vs. NSBCX (5.84B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NSBCX: RWMFX (1.53) vs NSBCX (0.16). NSBCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NSBCX (19 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). NSBCX (1.67) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NSBCX (11.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBCX: RWMFX (250) vs NSBCX (2500). NSBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.04 vs. RWMFX (-0.11). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 56.08 vs. NSBCX (52.51).
| NSBCX | RWMFX | NSBCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.31 | 539% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.31 | 539% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.975 | -2.504 | 199% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.84B | 181B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 1.53 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.04 | -0.11 | -1,825% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.78 | 6.24 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.51 | 56.08 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.44 | 54.24 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...