Ad is loading...
NSBCX vs RWMFX
NSBCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NSBCX vs RWMFX
Nuveen Dividend Growth C
Price$62.96
Change-$0.35 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$65.77
Change-$0.52 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
NSBCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSBCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSBCX is a Hold and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 196B vs. NSBCX (6.27B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NSBCX: RWMFX (1.70) vs NSBCX (0.33). NSBCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NSBCX (19 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NSBCX (17.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBCX: RWMFX (250) vs NSBCX (2500). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.20 vs. NSBCX (13.68). NSBCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.55 vs. RWMFX (39.32).
| NSBCX | RWMFX | NSBCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.099 | 16.419 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.27B | 196B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 1.70 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.68 | 17.20 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.58 | 15.87 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.55 | 39.32 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.26 | 69.07 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers