Ad is loading...
NSBCX vs RWMFX
NSBCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NSBCX vs RWMFX
Nuveen Dividend Growth C
Price$62.66
Change-$0.73 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.45B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$64.14
Change-$0.88 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.82B
NSBCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSBCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Feb 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSBCX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 199B vs. NSBCX (6.45B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NSBCX: RWMFX (1.70) vs NSBCX (0.33). NSBCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NSBCX (19 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NSBCX (17.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBCX: RWMFX (250) vs NSBCX (2500). NSBCX (11.78) and RWMFX (11.73) have marching annual gain over last year. NSBCX (41.26) and RWMFX (40.57) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NSBCX | RWMFX | NSBCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.681 | 5.997 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.45B | 199B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 1.70 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.78 | 11.73 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.95 | 19.13 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.26 | 40.57 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.66 | 65.25 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers