Ad is loading...
NSBFX vs RWMFX
NSBFX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NSBFX vs RWMFX
Nuveen Dividend Growth R6
Price$57.91
Change-$0.96 (-1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$58.60
Change-$0.88 (-1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets180.05B
NSBFX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSBFX vs. RWMFX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSBFX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 180B vs. NSBFX (5.82B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NSBFX: RWMFX (1.53) vs NSBFX (1.19). NSBFX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NSBFX (12 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). NSBFX (0.62) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NSBFX (11.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBFX: RWMFX (250) vs NSBFX (1000000). NSBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. RWMFX (-0.20). NSBFX return over 5 years is better than : 57.17 vs. RWMFX (49.18).
| NSBFX | RWMFX | NSBFX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.31 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.31 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.809 | -4.381 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.82B | 180B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.53 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.96 | -0.20 | -2,529% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.70 | 4.43 | 287% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.17 | 49.18 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.13 | 51.90 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers