Ad is loading...
NSBFX vs RWMFX
NSBFX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NSBFX vs RWMFX
Nuveen Dividend Growth R6
Price$63.42
Change-$0.73 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.35B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$64.14
Change-$0.88 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.11B
NSBFX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSBFX vs. RWMFX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSBFX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 196B vs. NSBFX (6.35B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NSBFX: RWMFX (1.70) vs NSBFX (1.27). NSBFX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NSBFX (12 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NSBFX (17.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBFX: RWMFX (250) vs NSBFX (1000000). NSBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.71 vs. RWMFX (8.20). NSBFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.83 vs. RWMFX (38.24).
| NSBFX | RWMFX | NSBFX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.224 | 4.242 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.35B | 196B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.70 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.71 | 8.20 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.77 | 18.09 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.83 | 38.24 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.67 | 61.66 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...