Ad is loading...
NSBFX vs RWMFX
NSBFX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NSBFX vs RWMFX
Nuveen Dividend Growth R6
Price$62.79
Change+$0.27 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.36B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$62.97
Change+$0.49 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets193.4B
NSBFX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSBFX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSBFX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 193B vs. NSBFX (6.36B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NSBFX: RWMFX (1.70) vs NSBFX (1.27). NSBFX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NSBFX (12 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NSBFX (17.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBFX: RWMFX (250) vs NSBFX (1000000). NSBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.55 vs. RWMFX (12.39). NSBFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.38 vs. RWMFX (35.03).
| NSBFX | RWMFX | NSBFX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.209 | 2.340 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.36B | 193B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.70 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.55 | 12.39 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.84 | 11.20 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.38 | 35.03 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.58 | 65.23 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...