Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSEIX vs RMFCX
NSEIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NSEIX vs RMFCX
Nicholas Equity Income I
Price$21.24
Change+$0.18 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets440.23M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.64
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
NSEIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSEIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSEIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. NSEIX (440M). NSEIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NSEIX (1.88) vs RMFCX (1.31). NSEIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NSEIX (32 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than NSEIX (0.70). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NSEIX (11.98). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSEIX: RMFCX (250) vs NSEIX (500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.01 vs. NSEIX (1.18). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.66 vs. NSEIX (26.58).
| NSEIX | RMFCX | NSEIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.260 | 5.919 | -38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 440M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.88 | 1.31 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.18 | 9.01 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.35 | 17.82 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.58 | 51.66 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.62 | 70.47 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers