Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSEIX vs RMFCX
NSEIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NSEIX vs RMFCX
Nicholas Equity Income I
Price$22.19
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets461.24M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.40
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.54B
NSEIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSEIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSEIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. NSEIX (461M). NSEIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NSEIX (1.78) vs RMFCX (1.26). NSEIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NSEIX (32 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than NSEIX (0.70). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NSEIX (28.42). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSEIX: RMFCX (250) vs NSEIX (500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.70 vs. NSEIX (6.50). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.40 vs. NSEIX (32.68).
| NSEIX | RMFCX | NSEIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.077 | 9.486 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 461M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.26 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.50 | 10.70 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.72 | 25.70 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.68 | 54.40 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.69 | 78.69 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement