Ad is loading...
NSEIX vs RMFCX
NSEIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NSEIX vs RMFCX
Nicholas Equity Income I
Price$20.17
Change-$0.57 (-2.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets429.89M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.20
Change-$1.36 (-2.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.3B
NSEIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSEIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSEIX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 98.3B vs. NSEIX (430M). NSEIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NSEIX (1.84) vs RMFCX (1.34). NSEIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NSEIX (31 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than NSEIX (0.70). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NSEIX (11.98). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSEIX: RMFCX (250) vs NSEIX (500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.11 vs. NSEIX (-0.84). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.06 vs. NSEIX (38.31).
| NSEIX | RMFCX | NSEIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.203 | -1.578 | 266% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 430M | 98.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.84 | 1.34 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.84 | 3.11 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.99 | 7.15 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.31 | 55.06 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.30 | 56.78 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers