Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFBX vs RBEJX
NSFBX vs RBEJX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFBX vs. RBEJX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFBX is a Buy and RBEJX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBEJX has more cash in the bank: 4.78B vs. NSFBX (3.46M). NSFBX pays higher dividends than RBEJX: NSFBX (3.61) vs RBEJX (2.37). NSFBX was incepted earlier than RBEJX: NSFBX (8 years) vs RBEJX (11 years). NSFBX (3.43) is less costly to investors than RBEJX (1.10). NSFBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RBEJX (6.00). RBEJX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFBX: RBEJX (250) vs NSFBX (1000000). RBEJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.40 vs. NSFBX (-1.04). RBEJX return over 5 years is better than : 15.88 vs. NSFBX (-8.73).
| NSFBX | RBEJX | NSFBX / RBEJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.10 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.43 | 1.10 | 312% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.369 | 4.996 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.46M | 4.78B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.61 | 2.37 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.04 | 7.40 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.72 | 11.94 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.73 | 15.88 | -55% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 25.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement