Ad is loading...
NSFBX vs RBEJX
NSFBX vs RBEJX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFBX vs. RBEJX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFBX is a Buy and RBEJX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBEJX has more cash in the bank: 4.74B vs. NSFBX (3.51M). NSFBX pays higher dividends than RBEJX: NSFBX (3.68) vs RBEJX (2.41). NSFBX was incepted earlier than RBEJX: NSFBX (8 years) vs RBEJX (11 years). NSFBX (3.43) is less costly to investors than RBEJX (1.10). NSFBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RBEJX (6.00). RBEJX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFBX: RBEJX (250) vs NSFBX (1000000). RBEJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.81 vs. NSFBX (-1.99). RBEJX return over 5 years is better than : 18.77 vs. NSFBX (-5.22).
| NSFBX | RBEJX | NSFBX / RBEJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.10 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.43 | 1.10 | 312% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.075 | 2.581 | -80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.51M | 4.74B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.68 | 2.41 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.99 | 5.81 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.43 | 12.09 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.22 | 18.77 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 21.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...