Ad is loading...
NSFBX vs RBEJX
NSFBX vs RBEJX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFBX vs. RBEJX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFBX is a Hold and RBEJX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBEJX has more cash in the bank: 4.89B vs. NSFBX (4.24M). NSFBX pays higher dividends than RBEJX: NSFBX (2.45) vs RBEJX (2.22). NSFBX was incepted earlier than RBEJX: NSFBX (8 years) vs RBEJX (10 years). NSFBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. RBEJX (7.00). RBEJX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFBX: RBEJX (250) vs NSFBX (1000000). RBEJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.23 vs. NSFBX (3.36). RBEJX return over 5 years is better than : 11.09 vs. NSFBX (-7.94).
| NSFBX | RBEJX | NSFBX / RBEJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.681 | 1.082 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.24M | 4.89B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 2.22 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.36 | 7.23 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.98 | 1.72 | -174% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.94 | 11.09 | -72% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 22.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...