Ad is loading...
NSFBX vs RDBTX
NSFBX vs RDBTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFBX vs. RDBTX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFBX is a Hold and RDBTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDBTX has more cash in the bank: 4.89B vs. NSFBX (4.24M). RDBTX pays higher dividends than NSFBX: RDBTX (2.62) vs NSFBX (2.45). NSFBX was incepted earlier than RDBTX: NSFBX (8 years) vs RDBTX (18 years). NSFBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. RDBTX (7.00). RDBTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFBX: RDBTX (250) vs NSFBX (1000000). RDBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.62 vs. NSFBX (3.36). RDBTX return over 5 years is better than : 13.24 vs. NSFBX (-7.94).
| NSFBX | RDBTX | NSFBX / RDBTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.681 | 1.064 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.24M | 4.89B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 2.62 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.36 | 7.62 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.98 | 2.91 | -103% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.94 | 13.24 | -60% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 26.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...