Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFBX vs RDBTX
NSFBX vs RDBTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFBX vs. RDBTX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFBX is a Buy and RDBTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDBTX has more cash in the bank: 4.78B vs. NSFBX (3.46M). NSFBX pays higher dividends than RDBTX: NSFBX (3.61) vs RDBTX (2.72). NSFBX was incepted earlier than RDBTX: NSFBX (8 years) vs RDBTX (18 years). NSFBX (3.43) is less costly to investors than RDBTX (0.64). NSFBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RDBTX (6.00). RDBTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFBX: RDBTX (250) vs NSFBX (1000000). RDBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.95 vs. NSFBX (-1.04). RDBTX return over 5 years is better than : 18.21 vs. NSFBX (-8.73).
| NSFBX | RDBTX | NSFBX / RDBTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.64 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.43 | 0.64 | 536% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.369 | 5.237 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.46M | 4.78B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.61 | 2.72 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.04 | 7.95 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.72 | 13.33 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.73 | 18.21 | -48% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement