Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFBX vs RDBTX
NSFBX vs RDBTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFBX vs. RDBTX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFBX is a Hold and RDBTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDBTX has more cash in the bank: 4.81B vs. NSFBX (513K). NSFBX pays higher dividends than RDBTX: NSFBX (3.54) vs RDBTX (2.65). NSFBX was incepted earlier than RDBTX: NSFBX (8 years) vs RDBTX (18 years). NSFBX (3.52) is less costly to investors than RDBTX (0.64). NSFBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RDBTX (6.00). RDBTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFBX: RDBTX (250) vs NSFBX (1000000). RDBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.92 vs. NSFBX (-0.37). RDBTX return over 5 years is better than : 20.41 vs. NSFBX (-8.44).
| NSFBX | RDBTX | NSFBX / RDBTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.64 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.52 | 0.64 | 550% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.616 | 8.183 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 513K | 4.81B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.54 | 2.65 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.37 | 8.92 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.22 | 20.27 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.44 | 20.41 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 34.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement