Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFBX vs RFJTX
NSFBX vs RFJTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFBX vs. RFJTX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFBX is a StrongBuy and RFJTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFJTX has more cash in the bank: 4.82B vs. NSFBX (2.59M). NSFBX pays higher dividends than RFJTX: NSFBX (3.54) vs RFJTX (3.01). NSFBX was incepted earlier than RFJTX: NSFBX (8 years) vs RFJTX (16 years). NSFBX (3.52) is less costly to investors than RFJTX (0.30). NSFBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RFJTX (6.00). RFJTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFBX: RFJTX (250) vs NSFBX (1000000). RFJTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.34 vs. NSFBX (0.01). RFJTX return over 5 years is better than : 23.57 vs. NSFBX (-6.34).
| NSFBX | RFJTX | NSFBX / RFJTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.30 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.52 | 0.30 | 1,173% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.678 | 7.755 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.59M | 4.82B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.54 | 3.01 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.01 | 9.34 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.10 | 21.63 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.34 | 23.57 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement