Ad is loading...
NSFBX vs RFJTX
NSFBX vs RFJTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFBX vs. RFJTX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFBX is a Hold and RFJTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFJTX has more cash in the bank: 4.89B vs. NSFBX (4.24M). RFJTX pays higher dividends than NSFBX: RFJTX (2.97) vs NSFBX (2.45). NSFBX was incepted earlier than RFJTX: NSFBX (8 years) vs RFJTX (16 years). NSFBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. RFJTX (7.00). RFJTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFBX: RFJTX (250) vs NSFBX (1000000). RFJTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.10 vs. NSFBX (3.36). RFJTX return over 5 years is better than : 14.83 vs. NSFBX (-7.94).
| NSFBX | RFJTX | NSFBX / RFJTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.681 | 1.061 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.24M | 4.89B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 2.97 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.36 | 8.10 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.98 | 3.80 | -78% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.94 | 14.83 | -54% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 29.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...