Ad is loading...
NSFBX vs RFJTX
NSFBX vs RFJTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFBX vs. RFJTX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFBX is a Buy and RFJTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFJTX has more cash in the bank: 4.74B vs. NSFBX (3.59M). NSFBX pays higher dividends than RFJTX: NSFBX (3.55) vs RFJTX (3.15). NSFBX was incepted earlier than RFJTX: NSFBX (8 years) vs RFJTX (16 years). NSFBX (3.43) is less costly to investors than RFJTX (0.30). RFJTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFBX: RFJTX (250) vs NSFBX (1000000). RFJTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.42 vs. NSFBX (-1.28). RFJTX return over 5 years is better than : 23.44 vs. NSFBX (-4.42).
| NSFBX | RFJTX | NSFBX / RFJTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.30 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.43 | 0.30 | 1,143% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.985 | 2.041 | -146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.59M | 4.74B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.55 | 3.15 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.28 | 7.42 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.99 | 10.83 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.42 | 23.44 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 26.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...