Ad is loading...
NSFDX vs RBEHX
NSFDX vs RBEHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFDX vs. RBEHX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFDX is a Buy and RBEHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBEHX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. NSFDX (4.11M). NSFDX pays higher dividends than RBEHX: NSFDX (3.05) vs RBEHX (2.22). NSFDX was incepted earlier than RBEHX: NSFDX (8 years) vs RBEHX (11 years). NSFDX (4.30) is less costly to investors than RBEHX (1.10). NSFDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RBEHX (5.00). RBEHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFDX: RBEHX (250) vs NSFDX (1000000). RBEHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.46 vs. NSFDX (-0.72). RBEHX return over 5 years is better than : 18.10 vs. NSFDX (-4.38).
| NSFDX | RBEHX | NSFDX / RBEHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.10 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.30 | 1.10 | 391% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.959 | 2.584 | -76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.11M | 14.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.05 | 2.22 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.72 | 5.46 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.28 | 13.21 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.38 | 18.10 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 25.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...