Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFEX vs RBDTX
NSFEX vs RBDTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFEX vs. RBDTX commentary
Jun 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFEX is a StrongBuy and RBDTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBDTX has more cash in the bank: 32.4B vs. NSFEX (6.77M). NSFEX pays higher dividends than RBDTX: NSFEX (2.63) vs RBDTX (1.72). NSFEX was incepted earlier than RBDTX: NSFEX (8 years) vs RBDTX (18 years). NSFEX (2.29) is less costly to investors than RBDTX (1.40). NSFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RBDTX (10.00). RBDTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFEX: RBDTX (250) vs NSFEX (1000000). RBDTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.91 vs. NSFEX (0.90). RBDTX return over 5 years is better than : 16.74 vs. NSFEX (6.74).
| NSFEX | RBDTX | NSFEX / RBDTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.40 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 1.40 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.199 | 4.545 | 4% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.77M | 32.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 1.72 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.90 | 6.91 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.83 | 12.82 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.74 | 16.74 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement