Ad is loading...
NSFFX vs RBETX
NSFFX vs RBETX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFFX vs. RBETX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFFX is a StrongBuy and RBETX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBETX has more cash in the bank: 50.2B vs. NSFFX (17.7M). NSFFX pays higher dividends than RBETX: NSFFX (1.67) vs RBETX (1.25). NSFFX was incepted earlier than RBETX: NSFFX (8 years) vs RBETX (18 years). NSFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RBETX (2.00). RBETX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFFX: RBETX (250) vs NSFFX (1000000). RBETX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.70 vs. NSFFX (8.45). RBETX return over 5 years is better than : 20.70 vs. NSFFX (18.06).
| NSFFX | RBETX | NSFFX / RBETX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.954 | 2.924 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.7M | 50.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.25 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.45 | 10.70 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.82 | 6.53 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.06 | 20.70 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers