Ad is loading...
NSFFX vs RBETX
NSFFX vs RBETX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFFX vs. RBETX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFFX is a Hold and RBETX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBETX has more cash in the bank: 48.8B vs. NSFFX (17.1M). NSFFX pays higher dividends than RBETX: NSFFX (2.25) vs RBETX (1.31). NSFFX was incepted earlier than RBETX: NSFFX (8 years) vs RBETX (18 years). NSFFX (1.56) is less costly to investors than RBETX (1.42). RBETX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFFX: RBETX (250) vs NSFFX (1000000). RBETX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.00 vs. NSFFX (2.92). RBETX (30.44) and NSFFX (29.93) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NSFFX | RBETX | NSFFX / RBETX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 1.42 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.42 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.519 | 0.776 | 196% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.1M | 48.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.25 | 1.31 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.92 | 5.00 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.90 | 9.98 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.93 | 30.44 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 39.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...