Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFFX vs RCETX
NSFFX vs RCETX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFFX vs. RCETX commentary
Jun 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFFX is a Hold and RCETX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCETX has more cash in the bank: 49.8B vs. NSFFX (14.4M). NSFFX pays higher dividends than RCETX: NSFFX (2.33) vs RCETX (1.68). NSFFX was incepted earlier than RCETX: NSFFX (8 years) vs RCETX (18 years). NSFFX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RCETX (0.97). NSFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RCETX (7.00). RCETX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFFX: RCETX (250) vs NSFFX (1000000). RCETX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.56 vs. NSFFX (-0.60). RCETX return over 5 years is better than : 26.37 vs. NSFFX (16.16).
| NSFFX | RCETX | NSFFX / RCETX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.97 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.97 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.779 | 5.474 | -32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.4M | 49.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.33 | 1.68 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.60 | 7.56 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.22 | 26.94 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.16 | 26.37 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 42.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement