Ad is loading...
NSFFX vs RCETX
NSFFX vs RCETX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFFX vs. RCETX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFFX is a Hold and RCETX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCETX has more cash in the bank: 48.8B vs. NSFFX (17.1M). NSFFX pays higher dividends than RCETX: NSFFX (2.25) vs RCETX (1.70). NSFFX was incepted earlier than RCETX: NSFFX (8 years) vs RCETX (18 years). NSFFX (1.56) is less costly to investors than RCETX (0.97). RCETX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFFX: RCETX (250) vs NSFFX (1000000). RCETX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.55 vs. NSFFX (2.92). RCETX return over 5 years is better than : 33.01 vs. NSFFX (29.93).
| NSFFX | RCETX | NSFFX / RCETX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.97 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.97 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.519 | 0.883 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.1M | 48.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.25 | 1.70 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.92 | 5.55 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.90 | 11.26 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.93 | 33.01 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 42.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...