Ad is loading...
NSFFX vs RCETX
NSFFX vs RCETX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFFX vs. RCETX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFFX is a StrongBuy and RCETX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCETX has more cash in the bank: 48.6B vs. NSFFX (16.5M). NSFFX pays higher dividends than RCETX: NSFFX (2.40) vs RCETX (1.73). NSFFX was incepted earlier than RCETX: NSFFX (8 years) vs RCETX (18 years). NSFFX (1.56) is less costly to investors than RCETX (0.97). NSFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RCETX (7.00). RCETX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFFX: RCETX (250) vs NSFFX (1000000). RCETX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.14 vs. NSFFX (-2.36). RCETX return over 5 years is better than : 30.81 vs. NSFFX (22.99).
| NSFFX | RCETX | NSFFX / RCETX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.97 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.97 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.568 | 2.001 | -228% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.5M | 48.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.40 | 1.73 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.36 | 6.14 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.35 | 17.41 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.99 | 30.81 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 37.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...