Ad is loading...
NSFFX vs RHETX
NSFFX vs RHETX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFFX vs. RHETX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFFX is a StrongBuy and RHETX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHETX has more cash in the bank: 48.6B vs. NSFFX (16.5M). NSFFX pays higher dividends than RHETX: NSFFX (2.40) vs RHETX (2.21). NSFFX was incepted earlier than RHETX: NSFFX (8 years) vs RHETX (9 years). NSFFX (1.56) is less costly to investors than RHETX (0.47). NSFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RHETX (7.00). RHETX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFFX: RHETX (250) vs NSFFX (1000000). RHETX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. NSFFX (-2.36). RHETX return over 5 years is better than : 33.43 vs. NSFFX (22.99).
| NSFFX | RHETX | NSFFX / RHETX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.47 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.47 | 332% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.568 | 2.159 | -212% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.5M | 48.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.40 | 2.21 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.36 | 6.67 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.35 | 18.79 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.99 | 33.43 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...