Ad is loading...
NSFFX vs RHETX
NSFFX vs RHETX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFFX vs. RHETX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFFX is a Hold and RHETX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHETX has more cash in the bank: 48.8B vs. NSFFX (17.1M). NSFFX (2.25) and RHETX (2.18) have matching dividends . NSFFX was incepted earlier than RHETX: NSFFX (8 years) vs RHETX (9 years). NSFFX (1.56) is less costly to investors than RHETX (0.47). RHETX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFFX: RHETX (250) vs NSFFX (1000000). RHETX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.08 vs. NSFFX (2.92). RHETX return over 5 years is better than : 35.60 vs. NSFFX (29.93).
| NSFFX | RHETX | NSFFX / RHETX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.47 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.47 | 332% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.519 | 0.933 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.1M | 48.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.25 | 2.18 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.92 | 6.08 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.90 | 12.57 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.93 | 35.60 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...