Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFGX vs RHFTX
NSFGX vs RHFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFGX vs. RHFTX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFGX is a Buy and RHFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHFTX has more cash in the bank: 51.8B vs. NSFGX (11.9M). NSFGX pays higher dividends than RHFTX: NSFGX (2.09) vs RHFTX (1.71). NSFGX was incepted earlier than RHFTX: NSFGX (8 years) vs RHFTX (10 years). NSFGX (1.30) is less costly to investors than RHFTX (0.48). NSFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RHFTX (7.00). RHFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFGX: RHFTX (250) vs NSFGX (1000000). RHFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.24 vs. NSFGX (1.02). RHFTX return over 5 years is better than : 39.03 vs. NSFGX (17.54).
| NSFGX | RHFTX | NSFGX / RHFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.48 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.48 | 271% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.559 | 9.693 | 6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9M | 51.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.09 | 1.71 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.02 | 11.24 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.15 | 34.41 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.54 | 39.03 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers