Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFGX vs RHFTX
NSFGX vs RHFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFGX vs. RHFTX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFGX is a StrongBuy and RHFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHFTX has more cash in the bank: 50.5B vs. NSFGX (15.4M). NSFGX pays higher dividends than RHFTX: NSFGX (2.15) vs RHFTX (1.78). NSFGX was incepted earlier than RHFTX: NSFGX (8 years) vs RHFTX (10 years). NSFGX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RHFTX (0.48). NSFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RHFTX (7.00). RHFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFGX: RHFTX (250) vs NSFGX (1000000). RHFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.62 vs. NSFGX (0.24). RHFTX return over 5 years is better than : 38.84 vs. NSFGX (17.94).
| NSFGX | RHFTX | NSFGX / RHFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.48 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.48 | 317% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.048 | 6.197 | -17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.4M | 50.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.15 | 1.78 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.24 | 8.62 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.74 | 32.44 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.94 | 38.84 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement