Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFGX vs RHFTX
NSFGX vs RHFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFGX vs. RHFTX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFGX is a StrongBuy and RHFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHFTX has more cash in the bank: 49.4B vs. NSFGX (18.2M). NSFGX pays higher dividends than RHFTX: NSFGX (2.23) vs RHFTX (1.85). NSFGX was incepted earlier than RHFTX: NSFGX (8 years) vs RHFTX (10 years). NSFGX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RHFTX (0.48). NSFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RHFTX (7.00). RHFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFGX: RHFTX (250) vs NSFGX (1000000). RHFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. NSFGX (-1.68). RHFTX return over 5 years is better than : 39.78 vs. NSFGX (19.31).
| NSFGX | RHFTX | NSFGX / RHFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.48 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.48 | 317% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.754 | 3.549 | -106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.2M | 49.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.23 | 1.85 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.68 | 7.45 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.59 | 22.75 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.31 | 39.78 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers