Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFHX vs RAKTX
NSFHX vs RAKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFHX vs. RAKTX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFHX is a Buy and RAKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RAKTX has more cash in the bank: 47.9B vs. NSFHX (11.3M). NSFHX pays higher dividends than RAKTX: NSFHX (1.58) vs RAKTX (0.55). NSFHX was incepted earlier than RAKTX: NSFHX (8 years) vs RAKTX (18 years). RAKTX (1.45) is less costly to investors than NSFHX (1.20). NSFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RAKTX (6.00). RAKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFHX: RAKTX (250) vs NSFHX (1000000). RAKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.21 vs. NSFHX (3.15). RAKTX return over 5 years is better than : 37.68 vs. NSFHX (21.75).
| NSFHX | RAKTX | NSFHX / RAKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.45 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.45 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.974 | 10.151 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3M | 47.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 0.55 | 287% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.15 | 9.21 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.31 | 37.50 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.75 | 37.68 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 67.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement