Ad is loading...
NSFHX vs RBEKX
NSFHX vs RBEKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFHX vs. RBEKX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFHX is a StrongBuy and RBEKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBEKX has more cash in the bank: 46.5B vs. NSFHX (28.3M). NSFHX pays higher dividends than RBEKX: NSFHX (1.27) vs RBEKX (1.00). NSFHX was incepted earlier than RBEKX: NSFHX (8 years) vs RBEKX (10 years). NSFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RBEKX (1.00). RBEKX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFHX: RBEKX (250) vs NSFHX (1000000). RBEKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.76 vs. NSFHX (6.74). RBEKX return over 5 years is better than : 29.82 vs. NSFHX (15.88).
| NSFHX | RBEKX | NSFHX / RBEKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.122 | 3.298 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.3M | 46.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.00 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.74 | 10.76 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.98 | 14.33 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.88 | 29.82 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 58.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...