Ad is loading...
NSFHX vs RBKTX
NSFHX vs RBKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFHX vs. RBKTX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFHX is a StrongBuy and RBKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBKTX has more cash in the bank: 44.2B vs. NSFHX (25.9M). NSFHX pays higher dividends than RBKTX: NSFHX (1.71) vs RBKTX (0.58). NSFHX was incepted earlier than RBKTX: NSFHX (8 years) vs RBKTX (18 years). NSFHX (1.50) and RBKTX (1.45) have similar cost to investors . NSFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RBKTX (6.00). RBKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFHX: RBKTX (250) vs NSFHX (1000000). RBKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.18 vs. NSFHX (1.52). RBKTX return over 5 years is better than : 39.70 vs. NSFHX (26.57).
| NSFHX | RBKTX | NSFHX / RBKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.45 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.45 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.854 | 1.109 | -167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.9M | 44.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 0.58 | 293% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.52 | 6.18 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.18 | 22.86 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.57 | 39.70 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...