Ad is loading...
NSFHX vs RBKTX
NSFHX vs RBKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFHX vs. RBKTX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFHX is a Hold and RBKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBKTX has more cash in the bank: 45.9B vs. NSFHX (27.8M). NSFHX pays higher dividends than RBKTX: NSFHX (1.27) vs RBKTX (0.76). NSFHX was incepted earlier than RBKTX: NSFHX (8 years) vs RBKTX (18 years). NSFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RBKTX (1.00). RBKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFHX: RBKTX (250) vs NSFHX (1000000). RBKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.31 vs. NSFHX (10.29). RBKTX return over 5 years is better than : 26.33 vs. NSFHX (13.24).
| NSFHX | RBKTX | NSFHX / RBKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.561 | 1.915 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.8M | 45.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.76 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.29 | 14.31 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.62 | 6.53 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.24 | 26.33 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...