Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFJX vs RBHHX
NSFJX vs RBHHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFJX vs. RBHHX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFJX is a StrongBuy and RBHHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBHHX has more cash in the bank: 40.3B vs. NSFJX (23.1M). NSFJX pays higher dividends than RBHHX: NSFJX (1.47) vs RBHHX (0.71). NSFJX was incepted earlier than RBHHX: NSFJX (8 years) vs RBHHX (11 years). NSFJX (1.63) is less costly to investors than RBHHX (1.17). NSFJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. RBHHX (5.00). RBHHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFJX: RBHHX (250) vs NSFJX (1000000). RBHHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.36 vs. NSFJX (4.07). RBHHX return over 5 years is better than : 38.76 vs. NSFJX (25.25).
| NSFJX | RBHHX | NSFJX / RBHHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.17 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 1.17 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.128 | 6.696 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.1M | 40.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 0.71 | 208% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.07 | 10.36 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.68 | 24.40 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.25 | 38.76 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 67.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement