Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFJX vs RBHHX
NSFJX vs RBHHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFJX vs. RBHHX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFJX is a Buy and RBHHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBHHX has more cash in the bank: 42B vs. NSFJX (12.7M). NSFJX pays higher dividends than RBHHX: NSFJX (1.42) vs RBHHX (0.67). NSFJX was incepted earlier than RBHHX: NSFJX (8 years) vs RBHHX (11 years). NSFJX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RBHHX (1.17). NSFJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. RBHHX (5.00). RBHHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFJX: RBHHX (250) vs NSFJX (1000000). RBHHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.81 vs. NSFJX (4.46). RBHHX return over 5 years is better than : 41.44 vs. NSFJX (28.46).
| NSFJX | RBHHX | NSFJX / RBHHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.17 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.17 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.412 | 11.111 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.7M | 42B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.67 | 211% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.46 | 11.81 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.85 | 40.92 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.46 | 41.44 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.94 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement