Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
NSFLX vs RCMTX
NSFLX vs RCMTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFLX vs. RCMTX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFLX is a Buy and RCMTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCMTX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. NSFLX (21.4M). NSFLX pays higher dividends than RCMTX: NSFLX (1.07) vs RCMTX (0.86). NSFLX was incepted earlier than RCMTX: NSFLX (8 years) vs RCMTX (15 years). NSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RCMTX (1.00). RCMTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFLX: RCMTX (250) vs NSFLX (1000000). RCMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.39 vs. NSFLX (19.99). RCMTX return over 5 years is better than : 33.35 vs. NSFLX (22.05).
| NSFLX | RCMTX | NSFLX / RCMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.491 | 14.434 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.4M | 23.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.86 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.99 | 21.39 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.23 | -2.20 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.05 | 33.35 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 67.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers