Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFLX vs RCMTX
NSFLX vs RCMTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFLX vs. RCMTX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFLX is a StrongBuy and RCMTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCMTX has more cash in the bank: 26.5B vs. NSFLX (20M). NSFLX pays higher dividends than RCMTX: NSFLX (1.34) vs RCMTX (0.61). NSFLX was incepted earlier than RCMTX: NSFLX (8 years) vs RCMTX (15 years). NSFLX (1.90) is less costly to investors than RCMTX (1.03). NSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RCMTX (5.00). RCMTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFLX: RCMTX (250) vs NSFLX (1000000). RCMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.36 vs. NSFLX (6.58). RCMTX return over 5 years is better than : 45.08 vs. NSFLX (33.06).
| NSFLX | RCMTX | NSFLX / RCMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 1.03 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.03 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.038 | 6.527 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20M | 26.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.61 | 222% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.58 | 9.36 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.68 | 38.48 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.06 | 45.08 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 73.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers