Ad is loading...
NSFLX vs RCMTX
NSFLX vs RCMTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFLX vs. RCMTX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFLX is a StrongBuy and RCMTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCMTX has more cash in the bank: 24.7B vs. NSFLX (22.8M). NSFLX pays higher dividends than RCMTX: NSFLX (1.41) vs RCMTX (0.64). NSFLX was incepted earlier than RCMTX: NSFLX (8 years) vs RCMTX (15 years). NSFLX (1.90) is less costly to investors than RCMTX (1.03). NSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RCMTX (5.00). RCMTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFLX: RCMTX (250) vs NSFLX (1000000). RCMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.19 vs. NSFLX (1.39). RCMTX return over 5 years is better than : 43.45 vs. NSFLX (32.44).
| NSFLX | RCMTX | NSFLX / RCMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 1.03 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.03 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.221 | 0.738 | -301% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.8M | 24.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.64 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.39 | 6.19 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.56 | 25.64 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.44 | 43.45 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...