Ad is loading...
NSFLX vs RCMTX
NSFLX vs RCMTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFLX vs. RCMTX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFLX is a Hold and RCMTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCMTX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. NSFLX (21.5M). NSFLX pays higher dividends than RCMTX: NSFLX (1.07) vs RCMTX (0.86). NSFLX was incepted earlier than RCMTX: NSFLX (8 years) vs RCMTX (15 years). NSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RCMTX (1.00). RCMTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFLX: RCMTX (250) vs NSFLX (1000000). RCMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.73 vs. NSFLX (12.65). RCMTX return over 5 years is better than : 30.14 vs. NSFLX (17.40).
| NSFLX | RCMTX | NSFLX / RCMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.900 | 2.059 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.5M | 24.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.86 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.65 | 15.73 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.37 | 7.80 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.40 | 30.14 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 74.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...