Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFLX vs RCMTX
NSFLX vs RCMTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFLX vs. RCMTX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFLX is a Hold and RCMTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCMTX has more cash in the bank: 27.6B vs. NSFLX (6.87M). NSFLX pays higher dividends than RCMTX: NSFLX (1.29) vs RCMTX (0.58). NSFLX was incepted earlier than RCMTX: NSFLX (8 years) vs RCMTX (15 years). NSFLX (1.43) is less costly to investors than RCMTX (1.03). NSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RCMTX (5.00). RCMTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFLX: RCMTX (250) vs NSFLX (1000000). RCMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.28 vs. NSFLX (-39.90). RCMTX return over 5 years is better than : 44.67 vs. NSFLX (-28.80).
| NSFLX | RCMTX | NSFLX / RCMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.03 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.03 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -40.960 | 12.510 | -327% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.87M | 27.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.58 | 224% |
| Returns for 1 year | -39.90 | 16.28 | -245% |
| Returns for 3 years | -23.73 | 41.81 | -57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.80 | 44.67 | -64% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.77 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement