Ad is loading...
NSVAX vs SSGSX
NSVAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NSVAX vs SSGSX
Columbia Small Cap Value II Inst
Price$13.41
Change+$0.23 (+1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets811.62M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$43.60
Change+$0.57 (+1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.8B
NSVAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSVAX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSVAX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.8B vs. NSVAX (812M). NSVAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NSVAX (1.88) vs SSGSX (0.52). NSVAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NSVAX (23 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NSVAX (1.11). NSVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). NSVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: NSVAX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.13 vs. NSVAX (-21.89). NSVAX (51.54) and SSGSX (49.15) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NSVAX | SSGSX | NSVAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.26 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.26 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.345 | -7.323 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 812M | 5.8B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.88 | 0.52 | 365% |
| Returns for 1 year | -21.89 | -10.13 | 216% |
| Returns for 3 years | -28.20 | -12.11 | 233% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.54 | 49.15 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.36 | 9.81 | -248% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers