Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSVAX vs SSGSX
NSVAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NSVAX vs SSGSX
Columbia Small Cap Value II Inst
Price$13.67
Change+$0.11 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets845.64M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.29
Change+$0.15 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.38B
NSVAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSVAX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSVAX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.38B vs. NSVAX (846M). NSVAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NSVAX (1.38) vs SSGSX (0.50). NSVAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NSVAX (23 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NSVAX (1.11). NSVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). NSVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: NSVAX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.25 vs. NSVAX (-9.40). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 14.49 vs. NSVAX (9.57).
| NSVAX | SSGSX | NSVAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.26 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.26 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.937 | -4.609 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 846M | 5.38B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.50 | 276% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.40 | -6.25 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.85 | -7.04 | 225% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.57 | 14.49 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.22 | 13.13 | -146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement