Ad is loading...
NTCCX vs RMTCX
NTCCX vs RMTCX Comparison
Open Charts NTCCX vs RMTCX
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond C
Price$10.45
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets653.16M
Columbia Minnesota Tax-Exempt C
Price$18.93
Change-$0.06 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets474.08M
NTCCX vs RMTCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NTCCX vs. RMTCX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NTCCX is a Hold and RMTCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTCCX has more cash in the bank: 653M vs. RMTCX (474M). NTCCX pays higher dividends than RMTCX: NTCCX (2.75) vs RMTCX (2.46). NTCCX was incepted earlier than RMTCX: NTCCX (11 years) vs RMTCX (25 years). NTCCX (1.59) and RMTCX (1.56) have similar cost to investors . NTCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. RMTCX (10.00). RMTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTCCX: RMTCX (2000) vs NTCCX (2500). RMTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.15 vs. NTCCX (0.14). NTCCX return over 5 years is better than : -0.44 vs. RMTCX (-3.38).
| NTCCX | RMTCX | NTCCX / RMTCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.56 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.56 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.629 | -2.140 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 653M | 474M | 138% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.75 | 2.46 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | 0.15 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.43 | 3.16 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.44 | -3.38 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.55 | 4.83 | 218% |