Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NTCCX vs RMTCX
NTCCX vs RMTCX Comparison
Open Charts NTCCX vs RMTCX
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond C
Price$10.41
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets645.55M
Columbia Minnesota Tax-Exempt C
Price$18.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets474.78M
NTCCX vs RMTCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NTCCX vs. RMTCX commentary
Jun 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NTCCX is a Hold and RMTCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTCCX has more cash in the bank: 646M vs. RMTCX (475M). NTCCX pays higher dividends than RMTCX: NTCCX (2.77) vs RMTCX (2.48). NTCCX was incepted earlier than RMTCX: NTCCX (11 years) vs RMTCX (25 years). NTCCX (1.59) and RMTCX (1.56) have similar cost to investors . NTCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. RMTCX (10.00). RMTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTCCX: RMTCX (2000) vs NTCCX (2500). NTCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.98 vs. RMTCX (-1.79). NTCCX return over 5 years is better than : -3.34 vs. RMTCX (-6.44).
| NTCCX | RMTCX | NTCCX / RMTCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.56 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.56 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.967 | -2.647 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 646M | 475M | 136% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.77 | 2.48 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.98 | -1.79 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.92 | 3.88 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.34 | -6.44 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.09 | 4.05 | 249% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement