NVGLF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.01 (-6.67%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
OICT
Price
$5.28
Change
+$0.28 (+5.60%)
Updated
Feb 8 closing price
Ad is loading...

NVGLF vs OICT

Header iconNVGLF vs OICT Comparison
Open Charts NVGLF vs OICTBanner chart's image
NV Gold
Price$0.14
Change-$0.01 (-6.67%)
Volume$1.45K
CapitalizationN/A
Oicintra
Price$5.28
Change+$0.28 (+5.60%)
Volume$156
CapitalizationN/A
NVGLF vs OICT Comparison Chart
Loading...
NVGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NVGLF vs. OICT commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NVGLF is a Hold and OICT is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (NVGLF: $0.14 vs. OICT: $5.28)
Brand notoriety: NVGLF and OICT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NVGLF: 22% vs. OICT: 100%
Market capitalization -- NVGLF: $4.35M vs. OICT: $0
NVGLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $4.35M. OICT’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NVGLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOICT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NVGLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OICT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OICT is a better buy in the long-term than NVGLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NVGLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NVGLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

NVGLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.73% price change this week, while OICT (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OICT YTD gains are higher at: 13.062 vs. NVGLF (-25.635).
NVGLFOICTNVGLF / OICT
Capitalization4.35MN/A-
EBITDA-2.18MN/A-
Gain YTD-25.63513.062-196%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash394KN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NVGLF vs OICT: Fundamental Ratings
NVGLF
OICT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8240
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9254
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OICT's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as NVGLF (32). This means that OICT’s stock grew similarly to NVGLF’s over the last 12 months.

OICT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NVGLF (100). This means that OICT’s stock grew similarly to NVGLF’s over the last 12 months.

NVGLF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as OICT (100). This means that NVGLF’s stock grew similarly to OICT’s over the last 12 months.

OICT's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NVGLF (92). This means that OICT’s stock grew somewhat faster than NVGLF’s over the last 12 months.

OICT's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NVGLF (100). This means that OICT’s stock grew similarly to NVGLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NVGLFOICT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NVGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIEAX21.36N/A
N/A
Brandes International Equity A
SMAYX41.46N/A
N/A
SEI Small Cap Growth Y (SIMT)
LISOX15.81-0.08
-0.50%
Lazard International Strategic Eq Open
BUIOX17.22-0.14
-0.81%
Buffalo Early Stage Growth Instl
TWUIX103.27-3.51
-3.29%
American Century Ultra® I

NVGLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NVGLF and NEWP have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NVGLF and NEWP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NVGLF
1D Price
Change %
NVGLF100%
N/A
NEWP - NVGLF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
OICT - NVGLF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSVLF - NVGLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSUPF - NVGLF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
OCANF - NVGLF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
More

OICT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OICT has been loosely correlated with BOCOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OICT jumps, then BOCOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OICT
1D Price
Change %
OICT100%
N/A
BOCOF - OICT
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
JNCCF - OICT
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PDIV - OICT
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AAMMF - OICT
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NVGLF - OICT
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More