Ad is loading...
NWABX vs RWMFX
NWABX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NWABX vs RWMFX
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$58.48
Change-$0.12 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets177.38B
NWABX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWABX vs. RWMFX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWABX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 177B vs. NWABX (1.52B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NWABX: RWMFX (1.53) vs NWABX (0.51). NWABX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NWABX (7 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). NWABX (0.59) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). NWABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.61 vs. RWMFX (31.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWABX: RWMFX (250) vs NWABX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.20 vs. NWABX (-5.49). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.18 vs. NWABX (38.17).
| NWABX | RWMFX | NWABX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.31 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.31 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.936 | -4.381 | 181% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 177B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.53 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.49 | -0.20 | 2,799% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.01 | 4.43 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.17 | 49.18 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 51.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers