Ad is loading...
NWADX vs RGAFX
NWADX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts NWADX vs RGAFX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr Eagle
Price$18.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.96M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$72.59
Change-$0.09 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.87B
NWADX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWADX vs. RGAFX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWADX is a StrongBuy and RGAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 286B vs. NWADX (177M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than NWADX: RGAFX (0.65) vs NWADX (0.00). NWADX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: NWADX (7 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). NWADX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWADX (8.16). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWADX: RGAFX (250) vs NWADX (50000). NWADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.27 vs. RGAFX (3.45). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.83 vs. NWADX (39.05).
| NWADX | RGAFX | NWADX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.34 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.34 | 297% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.219 | -2.459 | 212% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177M | 286B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.65 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.27 | 3.45 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.10 | 33.96 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.05 | 45.83 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.63 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...