Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWAUX vs RGAHX
NWAUX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts NWAUX vs RGAHX
NWAUX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. NWAUX (398M). NWAUX pays higher dividends than RGAHX: NWAUX (2.26) vs RGAHX (0.39). NWAUX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: NWAUX (5 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). NWAUX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). NWAUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.65 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAUX: RGAHX (250) vs NWAUX (2000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.19 vs. NWAUX (0.93). NWAUX return over 5 years is better than : 35.87 vs. RGAHX (16.49).
| NWAUX | RGAHX | NWAUX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.44 | 202% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.44 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.674 | 6.840 | 83% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 398M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.26 | 0.39 | 574% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.93 | 6.19 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.19 | 45.18 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.87 | 16.49 | 218% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.64 | - |