Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWAUX vs RGEBX
NWAUX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWAUX vs RGEBX
NWAUX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. NWAUX (394M). NWAUX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: NWAUX (2.32) vs RGEBX (0.00). NWAUX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NWAUX (6 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than NWAUX (0.98). NWAUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.65 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAUX: RGEBX (250) vs NWAUX (2000). NWAUX (3.96) and RGEBX (3.78) have marching annual gain over last year. NWAUX return over 5 years is better than : 34.10 vs. RGEBX (13.68).
| NWAUX | RGEBX | NWAUX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.08 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.08 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.468 | 10.279 | 82% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 394M | 342B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.96 | 3.78 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.59 | 43.84 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.10 | 13.68 | 249% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers