RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. NWAUX (385M). NWAUX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: NWAUX (2.39) vs RGEBX (0.00). NWAUX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NWAUX (6 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than NWAUX (0.98). NWAUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.65 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAUX: RGEBX (250) vs NWAUX (2000). NWAUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.76 vs. RGEBX (-1.37). NWAUX return over 5 years is better than : 32.50 vs. RGEBX (7.25).

	NWAUX	RGEBX	NWAUX / RGEBX
Total Expense Ratio	0.89	1.08	82%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	0.98	1.08	91%
Fund Existence	6 years	12 years	-
Gain YTD	5.527	3.522	157%
Front Load	6%	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	2000	250	800%
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	385M	357B	0%
Annual Yield % from dividends	2.39	0.00	-
Returns for 1 year	2.76	-1.37	-202%
Returns for 3 years	19.65	31.56	62%
Returns for 5 years	32.50	7.25	449%
Returns for 10 years	N/A	87.68	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
GRGTX	54.51	0.52	+0.96%
Goldman Sachs Equity Income Inv
SGENX	84.81	0.52	+0.62%
First Eagle Global A
PSMJX	12.59	0.07	+0.56%
Principal SmallCap Value II J
PZHEX	13.85	0.03	+0.22%
T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity Z
WCEIX	10.41	0.01	+0.10%
Virtus Westchester Event-Driven Fd I