Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWAUX vs RGEBX
NWAUX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWAUX vs RGEBX
NWAUX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. NWAUX (398M). NWAUX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: NWAUX (2.26) vs RGEBX (0.00). NWAUX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NWAUX (5 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than NWAUX (0.98). NWAUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.65 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAUX: RGEBX (250) vs NWAUX (2000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.18 vs. NWAUX (0.93). NWAUX return over 5 years is better than : 35.87 vs. RGEBX (12.32).
| NWAUX | RGEBX | NWAUX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.08 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.08 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.674 | 6.522 | 87% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 398M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.26 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.93 | 5.18 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.19 | 41.43 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.87 | 12.32 | 291% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 105.28 | - |