Ad is loading...
NWCCX vs RGACX
NWCCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NWCCX vs RGACX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG C
Price$35.12
Change+$0.63 (+1.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets760.07M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$64.89
Change+$1.02 (+1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.04B
NWCCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCCX vs. RGACX commentary
Apr 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. NWCCX (760M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: RGACX (0.09) vs NWCCX (0.00). NWCCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NWCCX (16 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NWCCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: RGACX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.75 vs. NWCCX (-18.95). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 44.89 vs. NWCCX (14.58).
| NWCCX | RGACX | NWCCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.94 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.94 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.241 | -9.862 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 760M | 265B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.09 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.95 | -5.75 | 330% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.32 | 5.76 | -162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.58 | 44.89 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.38 | 47.51 | -39% |