NWG
Price
$10.21
Change
+$0.08 (+0.79%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
29.27B
26 days until earnings call
WF
Price
$32.13
Change
-$0.02 (-0.06%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
7.73B
17 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NWG vs WF

Header iconNWG vs WF Comparison
Open Charts NWG vs WFBanner chart's image
NatWest Group
Price$10.21
Change+$0.08 (+0.79%)
Volume$3.09M
Capitalization29.27B
Woori Financial Group
Price$32.13
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
Volume$40.76K
Capitalization7.73B
NWG vs WF Comparison Chart
Loading...
NWG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NWG vs. WF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWG is a Hold and WF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (NWG: $10.21 vs. WF: $32.13)
Brand notoriety: NWG and WF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NWG: 144% vs. WF: 66%
Market capitalization -- NWG: $29.27B vs. WF: $7.73B
NWG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $29.27B. WF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $7.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NWG’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileWF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • NWG’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • WF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, NWG is a better buy in the long-term than WF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NWG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NWG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WF is a better buy in the short-term than NWG.

Price Growth

NWG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +10.50% price change this week, while WF (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

NWG is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.

WF is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWG($29.3B) has a higher market cap than WF($7.73B). NWG has higher P/E ratio than WF: NWG (5.44) vs WF (3.62). WF YTD gains are higher at: 2.816 vs. NWG (0.393). WF has higher revenues than NWG: WF (11.84T) vs NWG (14.8B).
NWGWFNWG / WF
Capitalization29.3B7.73B379%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.3932.81614%
P/E Ratio5.443.62150%
Revenue14.8B11.84T0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt60.1BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NWG vs WF: Fundamental Ratings
NWG
WF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
394
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
191
SMR RATING
1..100
51
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4054
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1228
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WF's Valuation (4) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (31). This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (19). This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

WF's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (5). This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WF (54). This means that NWG’s stock grew similarly to WF’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WF (28). This means that NWG’s stock grew similarly to WF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NWGWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NWG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INDP0.84N/A
+0.23%
Indaptus Therapeutics
RDCM14.07-0.02
-0.18%
Radcom Ltd
BNL15.75-0.12
-0.76%
Broadstone Net Lease
MGM32.85-0.28
-0.85%
MGM Resorts International
CBL28.14-0.46
-1.61%
CBL & Associates Properties

NWG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWG has been closely correlated with BCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NWG jumps, then BCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWG
1D Price
Change %
NWG100%
+0.79%
BCS - NWG
68%
Closely correlated
+1.93%
LYG - NWG
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
UBS - NWG
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.68%
BBVA - NWG
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ING - NWG
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
More