Ad is loading...
NWHZX vs WCMLX
NWHZX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NWHZX vs WCMLX
Nationwide Geneva Small Cap Gr A
Price$76.22
Change+$1.25 (+1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.44B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.80
Change+$0.13 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.14M
NWHZX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHZX vs. WCMLX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHZX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWHZX has more cash in the bank: 1.44B vs. WCMLX (42.1M). NWHZX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWHZX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NWHZX (16 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than NWHZX (1.20). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. NWHZX (21.28). NWHZX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NWHZX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). NWHZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.56 vs. WCMLX (-6.86). NWHZX return over 5 years is better than : 27.09 vs. WCMLX (21.31).
| NWHZX | WCMLX | NWHZX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.99 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.86 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.080 | -9.253 | 87% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.44B | 42.1M | 3,428% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.56 | -6.86 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.35 | 15.89 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.09 | 21.31 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.49 | N/A | - |