Ad is loading...
NWHZX vs WCMLX
NWHZX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NWHZX vs WCMLX
Nationwide Geneva Small Cap Gr A
Price$71.26
Change-$1.81 (-2.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.4B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$10.62
Change-$0.46 (-4.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.93M
NWHZX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHZX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHZX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWHZX has more cash in the bank: 1.4B vs. WCMLX (39.9M). NWHZX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWHZX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NWHZX (16 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than NWHZX (1.20). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. NWHZX (21.28). NWHZX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NWHZX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). NWHZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.64 vs. WCMLX (-13.23). NWHZX return over 5 years is better than : 36.89 vs. WCMLX (29.89).
| NWHZX | WCMLX | NWHZX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.99 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.86 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.410 | -13.841 | 75% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.4B | 39.9M | 3,516% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.64 | -13.23 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.33 | -5.46 | -79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.89 | 29.89 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers