Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHZX vs WCMNX
NWHZX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts NWHZX vs WCMNX
Nationwide Geneva Small Cap Gr A
Price$76.44
Change+$0.88 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$12.74
Change+$0.23 (+1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.81M
NWHZX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHZX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHZX is a StrongBuy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWHZX has more cash in the bank: 1.65B vs. WCMNX (42.8M). NWHZX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWHZX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: NWHZX (16 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than NWHZX (1.20). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. NWHZX (21.28). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHZX: WCMNX (1000) vs NWHZX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.27 vs. NWHZX (-10.43). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 16.76 vs. NWHZX (12.93).
| NWHZX | WCMNX | NWHZX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.24 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 2.04 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.357 | -2.285 | 322% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.65B | 42.8M | 3,853% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.43 | -6.27 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.77 | 20.39 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.93 | 16.76 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement