Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWMAX vs RDGTX
NWMAX vs RDGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWMAX vs. RDGTX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWMAX is a Hold and RDGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDGTX has more cash in the bank: 45.4B vs. NWMAX (182M). NWMAX pays higher dividends than RDGTX: NWMAX (2.45) vs RDGTX (1.25). NWMAX was incepted earlier than RDGTX: NWMAX (18 years) vs RDGTX (18 years). NWMAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RDGTX (0.70). NWMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.86 vs. RDGTX (6.00). RDGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWMAX: RDGTX (250) vs NWMAX (2000). RDGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. NWMAX (-2.73). RDGTX return over 5 years is better than : 45.65 vs. NWMAX (27.36).
| NWMAX | RDGTX | NWMAX / RDGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.70 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.70 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.965 | 3.631 | 82% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 182M | 45.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 1.25 | 196% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.73 | 8.31 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.54 | 26.33 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.36 | 45.65 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.38 | 62.28 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers