Ad is loading...
NWMAX vs RDGTX
NWMAX vs RDGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWMAX vs. RDGTX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWMAX is a Hold and RDGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDGTX has more cash in the bank: 44B vs. NWMAX (180M). NWMAX pays higher dividends than RDGTX: NWMAX (2.45) vs RDGTX (1.25). NWMAX was incepted earlier than RDGTX: NWMAX (18 years) vs RDGTX (18 years). NWMAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RDGTX (0.70). NWMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.86 vs. RDGTX (6.00). RDGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWMAX: RDGTX (250) vs NWMAX (2000). RDGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.59 vs. NWMAX (-3.19). RDGTX return over 5 years is better than : 48.73 vs. NWMAX (28.82).
| NWMAX | RDGTX | NWMAX / RDGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.70 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.70 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 1.668 | - |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 180M | 44B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 1.25 | 196% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.19 | 9.59 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.49 | 19.62 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.82 | 48.73 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.12 | 60.75 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...