NWPIF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.02M
THNPF
Price
$34.17
Change
+$2.95 (+9.45%)
Updated
May 1 closing price
Capitalization
4.01B
Ad is loading...

NWPIF vs THNPF

Header iconNWPIF vs THNPF Comparison
Open Charts NWPIF vs THNPFBanner chart's image
FLINT
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.48K
Capitalization2.02M
Technip Energies
Price$34.17
Change+$2.95 (+9.45%)
Volume$136
Capitalization4.01B
NWPIF vs THNPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NWPIF vs. THNPF commentary
May 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWPIF is a Hold and THNPF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 12, 2025
Stock price -- (NWPIF: $0.02 vs. THNPF: $34.17)
Brand notoriety: NWPIF and THNPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NWPIF: 42% vs. THNPF: 73%
Market capitalization -- NWPIF: $2.02M vs. THNPF: $4.01B
NWPIF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $2.02M. THNPF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $4.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NWPIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTHNPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NWPIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • THNPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, THNPF is a better buy in the long-term than NWPIF.

Price Growth

NWPIF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while THNPF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +3.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.30%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+3.91% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
THNPF($4.01B) has a higher market cap than NWPIF($2.02M). THNPF YTD gains are higher at: 28.221 vs. NWPIF (-67.140). THNPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 592M vs. NWPIF (11.1M). THNPF has more cash in the bank: 3.48B vs. NWPIF (1.04M). NWPIF has less debt than THNPF: NWPIF (224M) vs THNPF (986M). THNPF has higher revenues than NWPIF: THNPF (6.28B) vs NWPIF (656M).
NWPIFTHNPFNWPIF / THNPF
Capitalization2.02M4.01B0%
EBITDA11.1M592M2%
Gain YTD-67.14028.221-238%
P/E RatioN/A12.35-
Revenue656M6.28B10%
Total Cash1.04M3.48B0%
Total Debt224M986M23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NWPIF: Fundamental Ratings
NWPIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
69
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBTIX12.320.09
+0.74%
Bridge Builder Tax Managed Intl Eq
ARBFX13.20N/A
N/A
Arbitrage R
JDESX41.67-0.02
-0.05%
JPMorgan US Research Enhanced Equity I
NMUCX9.36-0.01
-0.11%
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp C
PAPPX28.99-0.06
-0.21%
Papp Small & Mid-Cap Growth

NWPIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NWPIF and WYGPY have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWPIF and WYGPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWPIF
1D Price
Change %
NWPIF100%
N/A
WYGPY - NWPIF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WYGPF - NWPIF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THNPF - NWPIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIMEF - NWPIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCEYF - NWPIF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+16.98%
More

THNPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that THNPF and THNPY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that THNPF and THNPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To THNPF
1D Price
Change %
THNPF100%
N/A
THNPY - THNPF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
ACDC - THNPF
8%
Poorly correlated
+10.69%
GZPZY - THNPF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFWFF - THNPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XPRO - THNPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
More