Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWSAX vs WCMLX
NWSAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NWSAX vs WCMLX
Nationwide Small Company Growth A
Price$11.31
Change-$0.07 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.13M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.96
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.06M
NWSAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWSAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWSAX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWSAX has more cash in the bank: 93.1M vs. WCMLX (42.1M). NWSAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWSAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NWSAX (13 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NWSAX (1.36). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. NWSAX (8.89). NWSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NWSAX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). NWSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.48 vs. WCMLX (-3.79). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 13.19 vs. NWSAX (-47.14).
| NWSAX | WCMLX | NWSAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.99 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.79 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.577 | -7.232 | 160% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.1M | 42.1M | 221% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.48 | -3.79 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | -23.32 | 10.67 | -219% |
| Returns for 5 years | -47.14 | 13.19 | -357% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.00 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement