Ad is loading...
NWSAX vs WCMLX
NWSAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NWSAX vs WCMLX
Nationwide Small Company Growth A
Price$10.59
Change-$0.09 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.83M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.25
Change-$0.03 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.18M
NWSAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWSAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWSAX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWSAX has more cash in the bank: 88.8M vs. WCMLX (40.2M). NWSAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWSAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NWSAX (13 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than NWSAX (1.36). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. NWSAX (8.89). NWSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NWSAX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.09 vs. NWSAX (-10.41). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 28.13 vs. NWSAX (-39.03).
| NWSAX | WCMLX | NWSAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.99 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.86 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -17.716 | -12.519 | 142% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.8M | 40.2M | 221% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.41 | -8.09 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | -32.33 | 0.72 | -4,514% |
| Returns for 5 years | -39.03 | 28.13 | -139% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.02 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers