Ad is loading...
NWSAX vs WCMNX
NWSAX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts NWSAX vs WCMNX
Nationwide Small Company Growth A
Price$10.59
Change-$0.09 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.83M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$11.10
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.18M
NWSAX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWSAX vs. WCMNX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWSAX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWSAX has more cash in the bank: 88.8M vs. WCMNX (40.2M). NWSAX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWSAX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: NWSAX (13 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.11) is less costly to investors than NWSAX (1.36). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. NWSAX (8.89). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWSAX: WCMNX (1000) vs NWSAX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.34 vs. NWSAX (-10.41). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 26.57 vs. NWSAX (-39.03).
| NWSAX | WCMNX | NWSAX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.24 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.11 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -17.716 | -12.530 | 141% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.8M | 40.2M | 221% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.41 | -8.34 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | -32.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | -39.03 | 26.57 | -147% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.02 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers