Ad is loading...
NWZLX vs RGAHX
NWZLX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts NWZLX vs RGAHX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr A
Price$20.53
Change-$0.77 (-3.62%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$73.85
Change-$9.79 (-11.70%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
NWZLX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWZLX vs. RGAHX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWZLX is a StrongBuy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 313B vs. NWZLX (217M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than NWZLX: RGAHX (0.64) vs NWZLX (0.00). NWZLX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: NWZLX (8 years) vs RGAHX (9 years). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NWZLX (12.63). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZLX: RGAHX (250) vs NWZLX (2000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.52 vs. NWZLX (31.73). NWZLX return over 5 years is better than : 64.86 vs. RGAHX (56.03).
| NWZLX | RGAHX | NWZLX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.581 | 34.146 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 217M | 313B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.64 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.73 | 35.52 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.82 | 18.86 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.86 | 56.03 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |