Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWZLX vs RGEBX
NWZLX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWZLX vs RGEBX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr A
Price$20.04
Change-$0.40 (-1.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.71M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$78.87
Change-$1.33 (-1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets325.26B
NWZLX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWZLX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWZLX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. NWZLX (214M). NWZLX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWZLX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NWZLX (8 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). NWZLX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWZLX (8.16). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZLX: RGEBX (250) vs NWZLX (2000). NWZLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.56 vs. RGEBX (13.25). RGEBX (39.30) and NWZLX (37.83) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NWZLX | RGEBX | NWZLX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.09 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.09 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.189 | 10.400 | 98% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214M | 325B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.56 | 13.25 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.31 | 44.00 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.83 | 39.30 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 73.76 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement