Ad is loading...
NYLAX vs RMUNX
NYLAX vs RMUNX Comparison
Open Charts NYLAX vs RMUNX
Lord Abbett New York Tax Free C
Price$10.27
Change+$0.03 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets578.36M
Invesco Rochester® New York Municipals A
Price$14.31
Change+$0.05 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.17B
NYLAX vs RMUNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NYLAX vs. RMUNX commentary
Apr 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NYLAX is a Hold and RMUNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMUNX has more cash in the bank: 4.17B vs. NYLAX (578M). RMUNX pays higher dividends than NYLAX: RMUNX (4.27) vs NYLAX (2.66). NYLAX was incepted earlier than RMUNX: NYLAX (29 years) vs RMUNX (39 years). NYLAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RMUNX (1.27). RMUNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NYLAX (18.00). NYLAX (1000) and RMUNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NYLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.20 vs. RMUNX (-0.44). RMUNX return over 5 years is better than : 8.08 vs. NYLAX (1.19).
| NYLAX | RMUNX | NYLAX / RMUNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.27 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.27 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.540 | -4.096 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 578M | 4.17B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.66 | 4.27 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.20 | -0.44 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.99 | 4.07 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.19 | 8.08 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.21 | 21.89 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...