Ad is loading...
OALC vs RECS
OALC vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts OALC vs RECS
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF
Price$27.81
Change-$1.07 (-3.70%)
Volume$900
Net Assets121.19M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$31.81
Change-$1.77 (-5.27%)
Volume$2.19K
Net Assets2.29B
OALC vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OALC vs. RECS commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OALC is a Hold and RECS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.29B vs. OALC (121M). OALC has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: OALC (-6.261) vs RECS (-8.001). OALC was incepted earlier than RECS: OALC (3 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than OALC (0.49). OALC has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| OALC | RECS | OALC / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -6.261 | -8.001 | 78% |
| Net Assets | 121M | 2.29B | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.15 | 327% |
| Turnover | 95.00 | 49.00 | 194% |
| Yield | 0.72 | 0.73 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| OALC | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 75% | 7 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
OALC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OALC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OALC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OALC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OALC | 100% | -3.82% | ||
| LRCX - OALC | 66% Closely correlated | -11.60% | ||
| AMAT - OALC | 65% Loosely correlated | -8.28% | ||
| MCHP - OALC | 63% Loosely correlated | -16.80% | ||
| PTC - OALC | 61% Loosely correlated | -4.89% | ||
| ETN - OALC | 61% Loosely correlated | -8.10% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -5.15% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -8.98% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -6.05% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -11.05% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -11.60% | ||
More | ||||