OBRUF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
SNLGF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.03 (-50.00%)
Updated
May 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

OBRUF vs SNLGF

Header iconOBRUF vs SNLGF Comparison
Open Charts OBRUF vs SNLGFBanner chart's image
OBERON URANIUM
Price$0.02
Change-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Volume$5K
CapitalizationN/A
SAN LORENZO GOLD
Price$0.03
Change-$0.03 (-50.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
OBRUF vs SNLGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
OBRUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OBRUF vs. SNLGF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OBRUF is a Hold and SNLGF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (OBRUF: $0.02 vs. SNLGF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: OBRUF and SNLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OBRUF: 7% vs. SNLGF: 100%
Market capitalization -- OBRUF: $272.69K vs. SNLGF: $2.87M
OBRUF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $272.69K. SNLGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OBRUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNLGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OBRUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SNLGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both OBRUF and SNLGF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OBRUF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • OBRUF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

OBRUF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SNLGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-3.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SNLGF($2.87M) has a higher market cap than OBRUF($273K). OBRUF YTD gains are higher at: -1.408 vs. SNLGF (-53.474).
OBRUFSNLGFOBRUF / SNLGF
Capitalization273K2.87M10%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.408-53.4743%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OBRUFSNLGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OBRUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FITFX13.23-0.05
-0.38%
Fidelity Flex International Index
PRJIX59.22-0.32
-0.54%
T. Rowe Price New Horizons I
BRUMX15.55-0.10
-0.64%
MFS Blended Research Value Equity R4
NEFOX31.81-0.32
-1.00%
Natixis Oakmark A
JACDX10.47-0.29
-2.70%
JHancock Global Environmental Opps R6

OBRUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OBRUF and SNLGF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OBRUF and SNLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OBRUF
1D Price
Change %
OBRUF100%
N/A
SNLGF - OBRUF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTRNF - OBRUF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMYLF - OBRUF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USCUF - OBRUF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.67%
MLPNF - OBRUF
17%
Poorly correlated
-3.25%
More

SNLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNLGF has been loosely correlated with WTRNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNLGF jumps, then WTRNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNLGF
1D Price
Change %
SNLGF100%
N/A
WTRNF - SNLGF
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CVWFF - SNLGF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PMYLF - SNLGF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OBRUF - SNLGF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTJHY - SNLGF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More