OCFCP
Price
$25.14
Change
-$0.04 (-0.16%)
Updated
Mar 10 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
RVSB
Price
$5.28
Change
+$0.12 (+2.33%)
Updated
Mar 11, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
99.64M
43 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

OCFCP vs RVSB

Header iconOCFCP vs RVSB Comparison
Open Charts OCFCP vs RVSBBanner chart's image
OceanFirst Financial
Price$25.14
Change-$0.04 (-0.16%)
Volume$3.57K
CapitalizationN/A
Riverview Ban
Price$5.28
Change+$0.12 (+2.33%)
Volume$200
Capitalization99.64M
OCFCP vs RVSB Comparison Chart
Loading...
RVSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OCFCP vs. RVSB commentary
Mar 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OCFCP is a Buy and RVSB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 12, 2025
Stock price -- (OCFCP: $25.14 vs. RVSB: $5.19)
Brand notoriety: OCFCP and RVSB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OCFCP: 107% vs. RVSB: 191%
Market capitalization -- OCFCP: $0 vs. RVSB: $99.64M
OCFCP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. RVSB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $99.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OCFCP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRVSB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OCFCP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RVSB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OCFCP is a better buy in the long-term than RVSB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RVSB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RVSB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

OCFCP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.04% price change this week, while RVSB (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

RVSB is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.57% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OCFCP YTD gains are higher at: 1.304 vs. RVSB (-9.266). RVSB has less debt than OCFCP: RVSB (186M) vs OCFCP (974M). OCFCP has higher revenues than RVSB: OCFCP (399M) vs RVSB (54.1M).
OCFCPRVSBOCFCP / RVSB
CapitalizationN/A99.6M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.304-9.266-14%
P/E RatioN/A10.08-
Revenue399M54.1M738%
Total CashN/A22M-
Total Debt974M186M524%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RVSB: Fundamental Ratings
RVSB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
73
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
94
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RVSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RVSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BUFBX21.14N/A
N/A
Buffalo Flexible Allocation
JSIVX22.50N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Small Cap Value L
FWOEX16.34N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership M
SVFAX75.67N/A
N/A
Smead Value A
DURIX13.63N/A
N/A
DWS ESG International Core Eq Instl

OCFCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCFCP has been closely correlated with WAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OCFCP jumps, then WAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCFCP
1D Price
Change %
OCFCP100%
-0.13%
WAL - OCFCP
67%
Closely correlated
-6.03%
WTFCP - OCFCP
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
FITBI - OCFCP
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
ZION - OCFCP
56%
Loosely correlated
-5.84%
FCNCO - OCFCP
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
More

RVSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RVSB has been loosely correlated with HOPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RVSB jumps, then HOPE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RVSB
1D Price
Change %
RVSB100%
-0.95%
HOPE - RVSB
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.93%
FLIC - RVSB
45%
Loosely correlated
-4.05%
OCFCP - RVSB
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
HTLF - RVSB
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
UMBF - RVSB
37%
Loosely correlated
-3.79%
More