Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OEMCX vs PELAX
OEMCX vs PELAX Comparison
Open Charts OEMCX vs PELAX
Invesco Emerging Markets Local Debt C
Price$5.41
Change+$0.01 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets86.67M
PIMCO Emerging Mkts Lcl Ccy and Bd A
Price$6.12
Change+$0.02 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29B
OEMCX vs PELAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OEMCX vs. PELAX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OEMCX is a Hold and PELAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PELAX has more cash in the bank: 2.29B vs. OEMCX (86.7M). PELAX pays higher dividends than OEMCX: PELAX (6.62) vs OEMCX (5.73). OEMCX was incepted earlier than PELAX: OEMCX (15 years) vs PELAX (18 years). PELAX (2.42) is less costly to investors than OEMCX (2.26). PELAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 135.00 vs. OEMCX (99.00). OEMCX (1000) and PELAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PELAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.82 vs. OEMCX (7.59). PELAX return over 5 years is better than : 20.67 vs. OEMCX (0.83).
| OEMCX | PELAX | OEMCX / PELAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 2.42 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 2.42 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.906 | 13.650 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 86.7M | 2.29B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.73 | 6.62 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.59 | 12.82 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.81 | 35.25 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.83 | 20.67 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.27 | 40.95 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement