Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OEMCX vs PELBX
OEMCX vs PELBX Comparison
Open Charts OEMCX vs PELBX
Invesco Emerging Markets Local Debt C
Price$5.41
Change+$0.01 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets86.67M
PIMCO Emerging Mkts Lcl Ccy and Bd Instl
Price$6.12
Change+$0.02 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29B
OEMCX vs PELBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OEMCX vs. PELBX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OEMCX is a Hold and PELBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PELBX has more cash in the bank: 2.29B vs. OEMCX (86.7M). PELBX pays higher dividends than OEMCX: PELBX (7.01) vs OEMCX (5.73). OEMCX was incepted earlier than PELBX: OEMCX (15 years) vs PELBX (19 years). OEMCX (2.26) is less costly to investors than PELBX (2.02). PELBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 135.00 vs. OEMCX (99.00). OEMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PELBX: OEMCX (1000) vs PELBX (1000000). PELBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.28 vs. OEMCX (7.59). PELBX return over 5 years is better than : 23.12 vs. OEMCX (0.83).
| OEMCX | PELBX | OEMCX / PELBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 2.02 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 2.02 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.906 | 13.916 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 86.7M | 2.29B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.73 | 7.01 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.59 | 13.28 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.81 | 36.89 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.83 | 23.12 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.27 | 46.84 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement