Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OEMCX vs TRZFX
OEMCX vs TRZFX Comparison
Open Charts OEMCX vs TRZFX
Invesco Emerging Markets Local Debt C
Price$5.41
Change+$0.01 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets86.67M
T. Rowe Price Emerg Mkts Lcl Ccy Bd Z
Price$4.95
Change+$0.01 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets291.98M
OEMCX vs TRZFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZFX has more cash in the bank: 292M vs. OEMCX (86.7M). TRZFX pays higher dividends than OEMCX: TRZFX (6.91) vs OEMCX (5.73). OEMCX was incepted earlier than TRZFX: OEMCX (15 years) vs TRZFX (4 years). OEMCX (2.26) is less costly to investors than TRZFX (0.77). OEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. TRZFX (75.20). TRZFX has a lower initial minimum investment than OEMCX: TRZFX (0) vs OEMCX (1000). TRZFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.46 vs. OEMCX (7.59).
| OEMCX | TRZFX | OEMCX / TRZFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.77 | 294% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.906 | 12.642 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 86.7M | 292M | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.73 | 6.91 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.59 | 10.46 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.81 | 30.24 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.83 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers