Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OEMCX vs TRZFX
OEMCX vs TRZFX Comparison
Open Charts OEMCX vs TRZFX
Invesco Emerging Markets Local Debt C
Price$5.36
Change-$0.02 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.26M
T. Rowe Price Emerg Mkts Lcl Ccy Bd Z
Price$4.90
Change-$0.02 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets289.69M
OEMCX vs TRZFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZFX has more cash in the bank: 290M vs. OEMCX (83.3M). TRZFX pays higher dividends than OEMCX: TRZFX (6.88) vs OEMCX (6.09). OEMCX was incepted earlier than TRZFX: OEMCX (15 years) vs TRZFX (4 years). OEMCX (2.26) is less costly to investors than TRZFX (0.77). OEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. TRZFX (75.20). TRZFX has a lower initial minimum investment than OEMCX: TRZFX (0) vs OEMCX (1000). TRZFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.88 vs. OEMCX (9.45).
| OEMCX | TRZFX | OEMCX / TRZFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.77 | 294% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.430 | 10.435 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 83.3M | 290M | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.09 | 6.88 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.45 | 11.88 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.29 | 28.05 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.43 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.00 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers