Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OEMCX vs TRZFX
OEMCX vs TRZFX Comparison
Open Charts OEMCX vs TRZFX
Invesco Emerging Markets Local Debt C
Price$5.44
Change-$0.01 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets85.05M
T. Rowe Price Emerg Mkts Lcl Ccy Bd Z
Price$4.96
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.02M
OEMCX vs TRZFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZFX has more cash in the bank: 293M vs. OEMCX (85.1M). TRZFX pays higher dividends than OEMCX: TRZFX (6.77) vs OEMCX (6.05). OEMCX was incepted earlier than TRZFX: OEMCX (15 years) vs TRZFX (4 years). OEMCX (2.26) is less costly to investors than TRZFX (0.77). OEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. TRZFX (75.20). TRZFX has a lower initial minimum investment than OEMCX: TRZFX (0) vs OEMCX (1000). TRZFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.14 vs. OEMCX (9.10).
| OEMCX | TRZFX | OEMCX / TRZFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.77 | 294% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.933 | 12.413 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.1M | 293M | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.05 | 6.77 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.10 | 11.14 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.36 | 35.05 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.61 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement