OKE
Price
$93.16
Change
-$0.07 (-0.08%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
58.69B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WMB
Price
$74.00
Change
-$1.25 (-1.66%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
90.5B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

OKE vs WMB

OKE vs WMB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? ONEOK (OKE) vs. Williams Companies (WMB) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • ONEOK (OKE) and Williams Companies (WMB) are two of the largest midstream energy infrastructure operators in the United States, yet they serve investors with distinctly different priorities.
  • OKE offers a higher dividend yield of approximately 4.4–5.1% and trades at a significantly lower P/E (price-to-earnings) multiple of around 15–16x, reflecting its value-oriented appeal.
  • WMB commands a premium valuation with a P/E near 35x but justifies it through a concentrated natural gas strategy, a massive project backlog tied to data center and LNG (liquefied natural gas) export demand, and a 52-year streak of consecutive dividend payments.
  • Both companies delivered record results in 2025, with OKE posting adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) of $8.02 billion and WMB reporting $7.75 billion.
  • OKE's growth has been fueled by acquisitions and synergy capture, while WMB's growth is driven by organic project execution, including its expanding "Power Innovation" portfolio targeting electricity demand from AI data centers.
  • The current market environment favors WMB's pure-play natural gas narrative, though OKE's diversified integrated model and compressed valuation may appeal to value-conscious and income-focused investors.

Introduction

When evaluating midstream energy stocks, few comparisons are as instructive as the one between OKE and WMB. ONEOK and Williams Companies both operate critical pipeline infrastructure across North America's most productive energy basins, yet their strategies, valuation profiles, and growth narratives diverge in meaningful ways. For income-oriented investors, dividend growth seekers, and those tracking sector rotation within energy, understanding how these two industry leaders stack up against each other can clarify which name better aligns with a given portfolio mandate. This comparison examines both companies through the lens of recent financial performance, business model differentiation, and observable market momentum.

OKE Overview and Recent Performance

OKE, headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma, has evolved into one of the largest diversified midstream operators in the United States, with a 60,000-mile pipeline network transporting natural gas, NGLs (natural gas liquids), crude oil, and refined products. The company's recent transformation has been defined by major acquisitions—most notably Magellan Midstream Partners, EnLink, and Medallion—that have expanded its footprint and created significant synergy opportunities. In its most recent full-year report, ONEOK posted net income attributable to common shareholders of $3.39 billion, or $5.42 per diluted share, with adjusted EBITDA reaching $8.02 billion, an 18% year-over-year increase. Approximately 90% of the company's earnings are fee-based, providing a degree of insulation from commodity price volatility. ONEOK also raised its quarterly dividend by 4% to $1.07 per share in early 2026 and extinguished nearly $3.1 billion of long-term debt during 2025, strengthening its balance sheet. Organic growth projects, including the Bighorn natural gas processing plant in the Permian Basin and the Eiger Express Pipeline joint venture, signal continued investment in future capacity. However, the company's 2026 guidance—with an adjusted EBITDA midpoint of approximately $8.1 billion—reflects management's conservative commodity price assumptions, specifically WTI (West Texas Intermediate) crude oil in the $55–$60 per barrel range, which may temper near-term earnings momentum.

WMB Overview and Recent Performance

WMB, also based in Tulsa, has positioned itself as a pure-play natural gas infrastructure leader, operating more than 33,000 miles of pipelines that handle approximately one-third of all natural gas consumed in the United States daily. Its crown jewel is the Transco pipeline system, an irreplaceable artery serving the Southeast and Mid-Atlantic. Williams delivered record full-year 2025 adjusted EBITDA of $7.75 billion, up 9% year-over-year, capping a five-year EBITDA CAGR (compound annual growth rate) of 9%. Net income reached $2.615 billion, or $2.14 per diluted share. The company completed 12 projects in 2025, including six pipeline transmission expansions, and has another 7.1 Bcf/d (billion cubic feet per day) of pipeline capacity currently in execution. A defining feature of the WMB growth story is its "Power Innovation" initiative—over $7 billion in capital dedicated to projects like Socrates and Socrates the Younger that aim to serve surging electricity demand from AI data centers. Williams raised its dividend by 5% to an annualized $2.10 per share, extending a 52-year streak of consecutive payments. Looking ahead, management guided 2026 adjusted EBITDA to a midpoint of $8.2 billion, reflecting continued confidence in project-driven earnings growth even as growth capital expenditures are expected to meaningfully expand to between $6.1 billion and $6.7 billion.

Trending AI Robots

In today's fast-moving markets, many traders and investors are turning to AI-driven tools to help navigate complex stock comparisons like this one. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's hundreds of AI-powered trading bots, each designed to trade specific tickers with distinct strategies. Only the most relevant and best-performing bots for current market conditions earn a place in this section. These bots span a wide range of trading styles—from swing trading and day trading to longer-term trend-following—and cover thousands of individual stocks across all market sectors. Performance metrics, win rates, and trade volumes vary by bot, offering transparency into how each algorithm navigates real-world conditions. Whether you are interested in midstream energy names like OKE and WMB or other sectors entirely, exploring the Trending AI Robots section may help you identify data-driven strategies aligned with the current market environment.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most striking contrast between OKE and WMB lies in their valuation and yield profiles. OKE trades at a P/E ratio of roughly 15–16x with a dividend yield above 4%, while WMB commands a P/E near 35x and yields approximately 2.5–2.9%. This valuation gap partly reflects business model differences: OKE is a diversified midstream conglomerate generating over $33 billion in annual revenue across NGLs, crude, refined products, and natural gas, whereas WMB generated approximately $11.5 billion in revenue with a tighter focus on natural gas transmission and gathering. WMB's premium is also supported by its higher operating margin—roughly 34% compared to OKE's approximately 19%—a reflection of its asset mix and the pricing power of its Transco franchise.

On the growth front, OKE's recent trajectory has been heavily influenced by acquisitions and the realization of merger synergies, which reached $475 million cumulatively through year-end 2025. WMB, by contrast, has relied on organic project execution, with a project backlog extending beyond 2030 and a narrative directly tied to structural demand themes such as LNG exports and data center electrification. WMB has delivered stronger recent price momentum, while OKE's stock has been pressured in part by its more cautious 2026 guidance tied to lower crude oil assumptions.

Risk profiles also differ. OKE carries higher absolute debt—approximately $30.8 billion versus WMB's roughly $28 billion—though both companies maintain manageable leverage ratios near 3.7–3.8x. WMB's elevated growth capital spending for 2026 introduces execution risk, while OKE faces integration risk as it continues to absorb its recent acquisitions. Neither company is meaningfully exposed to commodity prices at the earnings level, given that both derive roughly 90% of earnings from fee-based contracts, but OKE's broader product mix does introduce slightly more variable exposure.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, relative positioning, and catalyst visibility, an AI-driven analytical framework would likely lean toward WMB in the current market environment. Williams Companies has demonstrated stronger price momentum, a clearer and more concentrated growth narrative tied to structural demand from AI data centers and LNG exports, and a project backlog that provides multi-year earnings visibility. Its 52-year dividend streak and recently raised guidance add to a picture of steady operational execution. That said, OKE presents a compelling value case: its lower P/E multiple, higher dividend yield, and the potential for continued synergy capture from recent acquisitions could position it favorably if the market rotates toward value or if commodity prices stabilize above management's conservative assumptions. In probabilistic terms, WMB currently exhibits the stronger combination of trend momentum and catalyst clarity, while OKE may represent a more attractive entry point for those prioritizing income and valuation.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
OKE vs. WMB commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OKE is a Buy and WMB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (OKE: $93.16 vs. WMB: $74.00)
Brand notoriety: OKE and WMB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OKE: 119% vs. WMB: 87%
Market capitalization -- OKE: $58.69B vs. WMB: $90.5B
OKE [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $58.69B. WMB’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $90.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $124.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $17.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OKE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWMB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • OKE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WMB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WMB is a better buy in the long-term than OKE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OKE’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WMB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OKE’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WMB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OKE is a better buy in the short-term than WMB.

Price Growth

OKE (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -0.38% price change this week, while WMB (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +0.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

OKE is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

WMB is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.18% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WMB($90.5B) has a higher market cap than OKE($58.7B). WMB has higher P/E ratio than OKE: WMB (32.46) vs OKE (16.61). OKE YTD gains are higher at: 30.024 vs. WMB (24.909). OKE (7.92B) and WMB (7.67B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . WMB has less debt than OKE: WMB (30.3B) vs OKE (33.7B). OKE has higher revenues than WMB: OKE (35.2B) vs WMB (11.9B).
OKEWMBOKE / WMB
Capitalization58.7B90.5B65%
EBITDA7.92B7.67B103%
Gain YTD30.02424.909121%
P/E Ratio16.6132.4651%
Revenue35.2B11.9B296%
Total Cash172MN/A-
Total Debt33.7B30.3B111%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OKE vs WMB: Fundamental Ratings
OKE
WMB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1222
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
442
SMR RATING
1..100
5443
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2145
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4445
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4650

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OKE's Valuation (16) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as WMB (25). This means that OKE’s stock grew similarly to WMB’s over the last 12 months.

WMB's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OKE (44). This means that WMB’s stock grew somewhat faster than OKE’s over the last 12 months.

WMB's SMR Rating (43) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as OKE (54). This means that WMB’s stock grew similarly to OKE’s over the last 12 months.

OKE's Price Growth Rating (21) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as WMB (45). This means that OKE’s stock grew similarly to WMB’s over the last 12 months.

OKE's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as WMB (45). This means that OKE’s stock grew similarly to WMB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OKEWMB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OKE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WMB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLT324.974.79
+1.50%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings
EBC22.920.30
+1.33%
Eastern Bankshares
GOLD39.35-0.18
-0.46%
Gold.com Inc.
RDCM13.03-0.14
-1.06%
Radcom Ltd
HHS2.35-0.04
-1.67%
Harte Hanks

WMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WMB has been closely correlated with KMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WMB jumps, then KMI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WMB
1D Price
Change %
WMB100%
-1.66%
KMI - WMB
80%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
AM - WMB
78%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
DTM - WMB
75%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
TRGP - WMB
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
OKE - WMB
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
More