Loading...
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUSIO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OLO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USIO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
OLO (@Packaged Software) experienced а +5.63% price change this week, while USIO (@Packaged Software) price change was +9.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.68%.
OLO is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2024.
USIO is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2024.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
OLO | USIO | OLO / USIO | |
Capitalization | 889M | 44.7M | 1,989% |
EBITDA | -47.56M | 1.9M | -2,498% |
Gain YTD | -14.685 | -3.488 | 421% |
P/E Ratio | 9.87 | 370.37 | 3% |
Revenue | 228M | 82.6M | 276% |
Total Cash | 363M | 7.16M | 5,073% |
Total Debt | 18.9M | 3.38M | 559% |
OLO | USIO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 96 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OLO's Valuation (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for USIO (90). This means that OLO’s stock grew significantly faster than USIO’s over the last 12 months.
OLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as USIO (100). This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to USIO’s over the last 12 months.
USIO's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as OLO (93). This means that USIO’s stock grew similarly to OLO’s over the last 12 months.
USIO's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as OLO (62). This means that USIO’s stock grew similarly to OLO’s over the last 12 months.
USIO's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as OLO (100). This means that USIO’s stock grew similarly to OLO’s over the last 12 months.
OLO | USIO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 1 day ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago89% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago73% | 1 day ago80% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago87% | 9 days ago86% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago82% | 1 day ago89% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OLO has been loosely correlated with EVCM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OLO jumps, then EVCM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OLO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OLO | 100% | -1.21% | ||
EVCM - OLO | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.16% | ||
COMP - OLO | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
DDOG - OLO | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
COIN - OLO | 46% Loosely correlated | +4.23% | ||
TGL - OLO | 46% Loosely correlated | +3.08% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USIO has been loosely correlated with OLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USIO jumps, then OLO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To USIO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
USIO | 100% | +1.22% | ||
OLO - USIO | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
TGL - USIO | 36% Loosely correlated | +3.08% | ||
TDOC - USIO | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.32% | ||
HCAT - USIO | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.14% | ||
COMP - USIO | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.15% | ||
More |