OLO
Price
$6.87
Change
-$0.22 (-3.10%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
888.81M
2 days until earnings call
XYZ
Price
$68.35
Change
-$14.69 (-17.69%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
52.08B
67 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

OLO vs XYZ

Header iconOLO vs XYZ Comparison
Open Charts OLO vs XYZBanner chart's image
Olo
Price$6.87
Change-$0.22 (-3.10%)
Volume$4.68M
Capitalization888.81M
Block
Price$68.35
Change-$14.69 (-17.69%)
Volume$36.83M
Capitalization52.08B
OLO vs XYZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
OLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XYZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OLO vs. XYZ commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OLO is a Hold and XYZ is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (OLO: $6.87 vs. XYZ: $68.35)
Brand notoriety: OLO: Not notable vs. XYZ: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OLO: 394% vs. XYZ: 556%
Market capitalization -- OLO: $888.81M vs. XYZ: $52.08B
OLO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $888.81M. XYZ’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $52.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXYZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XYZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both OLO and XYZ are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OLO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XYZ’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OLO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • XYZ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OLO is a better buy in the short-term than XYZ.

Price Growth

OLO (@Packaged Software) experienced а -5.24% price change this week, while XYZ (@Packaged Software) price change was -18.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

OLO is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

XYZ is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.81% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XYZ($52.1B) has a higher market cap than OLO($889M). XYZ has higher P/E ratio than OLO: XYZ (4073.00) vs OLO (9.87). OLO YTD gains are higher at: -10.547 vs. XYZ (-19.579). XYZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 790M vs. OLO (-47.56M). XYZ has more cash in the bank: 9.02B vs. OLO (363M). OLO has less debt than XYZ: OLO (18.9M) vs XYZ (6.07B). XYZ has higher revenues than OLO: XYZ (21.9B) vs OLO (228M).
OLOXYZOLO / XYZ
Capitalization889M52.1B2%
EBITDA-47.56M790M-6%
Gain YTD-10.547-19.57954%
P/E Ratio9.874073.000%
Revenue228M21.9B1%
Total Cash363M9.02B4%
Total Debt18.9M6.07B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OLO vs XYZ: Fundamental Ratings
OLO
XYZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5254
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97100
SMR RATING
1..100
8981
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5152
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
66n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OLO's Valuation (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XYZ (44) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than XYZ’s over the last 12 months.

OLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as XYZ (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to XYZ’s over the last 12 months.

XYZ's SMR Rating (81) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as OLO (89) in the null industry. This means that XYZ’s stock grew similarly to OLO’s over the last 12 months.

OLO's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as XYZ (52) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to XYZ’s over the last 12 months.

OLO's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as XYZ (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to XYZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OLOXYZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XYZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EQPGX24.11N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth I
STPAX21.67N/A
N/A
Saratoga Technology & Comm A
PAADX16.54N/A
N/A
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R5
IGLGX19.49-0.36
-1.81%
Columbia Select Global Equity A
LSMIX13.76-0.44
-3.10%
Loomis Sayles Small/Mid Cap Growth Instl

XYZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XYZ has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XYZ jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XYZ
1D Price
Change %
XYZ100%
-17.69%
COIN - XYZ
72%
Closely correlated
-8.27%
CLSK - XYZ
67%
Closely correlated
-8.05%
RIOT - XYZ
62%
Loosely correlated
-9.83%
AFRM - XYZ
57%
Loosely correlated
-8.12%
HOOD - XYZ
52%
Loosely correlated
-7.96%
More