OOMA vs S
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OOMA is a Hold and S is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
S’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- S’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OOMA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while S’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- OOMA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
- S’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
S (@Packaged Software) experienced а +6.71% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.47%.
Reported Earning Dates
S is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+2.08% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| OOMA | S | OOMA / S | |
| Capitalization | 219M | 7.13B | 3% |
| EBITDA | 6.28M | -292.71M | -2% |
| Gain YTD | -0.356 | 4.595 | -8% |
| P/E Ratio | 121.43 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 228M | 621M | 37% |
| Total Cash | 29.5M | 926M | 3% |
| Total Debt | 16.4M | 22.9M | 72% |
OOMA | S | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 94 | 70 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
S's Valuation (69) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as OOMA (77) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to OOMA’s over the last 12 months.
S's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as OOMA (94) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to OOMA’s over the last 12 months.
OOMA's SMR Rating (93) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as S (95) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that OOMA’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.
OOMA's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as S (59) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that OOMA’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.
S's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for OOMA (77) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that S’s stock grew significantly faster than OOMA’s over the last 12 months.
| OOMA | S | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 74% | 16 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 73% | 16 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 75% | 16 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 74% | 16 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 72% | 18 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 75% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 77% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BLCN | 27.73 | 0.64 | +2.36% |
| Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF | |||
| QLVE | 25.11 | 0.06 | +0.24% |
| FlexShares EMs Quality Lw Vol ETF | |||
| AIA | 69.86 | 0.16 | +0.22% |
| iShares Asia 50 ETF | |||
| TJUL | 27.99 | -0.02 | -0.07% |
| Innovator Eq Defnd Protd ETF2 Yr-Jul2025 | |||
| AVDV | 65.89 | -0.24 | -0.36% |
| Avantis International Small Cap Val ETF | |||
OOMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OOMA and S have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OOMA and S's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OOMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OOMA | 100% | -0.71% | ||
| S - OOMA | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.16% | ||
| ATEX - OOMA | 31% Poorly correlated | -3.21% | ||
| SHEN - OOMA | 31% Poorly correlated | -5.95% | ||
| LILA - OOMA | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
| ATUS - OOMA | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.71% | ||
More | ||||