It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OPHC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLBC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OPHC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLBC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
OPHC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.22% price change this week, while PLBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -6.61% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.56%.
OPHC is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2025.
PLBC is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
OPHC | PLBC | OPHC / PLBC | |
Capitalization | 33.8M | 217M | 16% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 16.218 | 14.444 | 112% |
P/E Ratio | 4.74 | 7.21 | 66% |
Revenue | 27.2M | 80.1M | 34% |
Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 64.2M | 90M | 71% |
OPHC | PLBC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 44 | 28 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OPHC's Valuation (8) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for PLBC (85). This means that OPHC’s stock grew significantly faster than PLBC’s over the last 12 months.
PLBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OPHC (57). This means that PLBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than OPHC’s over the last 12 months.
PLBC's SMR Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OPHC (44). This means that PLBC’s stock grew similarly to OPHC’s over the last 12 months.
PLBC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OPHC (47). This means that PLBC’s stock grew similarly to OPHC’s over the last 12 months.
PLBC's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OPHC (90). This means that PLBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than OPHC’s over the last 12 months.
OPHC | PLBC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago66% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago54% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago66% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago59% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago57% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago75% | 4 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago59% | 2 days ago58% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago85% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% | 2 days ago53% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
ECMGX | 24.07 | N/A | N/A |
Eaton Vance Tx-Mgd Small-Cap C | |||
PXLIX | 14.97 | -0.45 | -2.92% |
Impax Large Cap Fund Institutional | |||
FICGX | 12.03 | -0.41 | -3.30% |
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl A | |||
ATHYX | 28.28 | -1.27 | -4.30% |
American Century Heritage Y | |||
SSCYX | 5.93 | -0.27 | -4.35% |
Saratoga Small Capitalization A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that OPHC and LSBK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OPHC and LSBK's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OPHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OPHC | 100% | -2.61% | ||
LSBK - OPHC | 32% Poorly correlated | -6.08% | ||
BOH - OPHC | 28% Poorly correlated | -4.60% | ||
PLBC - OPHC | 27% Poorly correlated | -6.04% | ||
USCB - OPHC | 27% Poorly correlated | -7.40% | ||
HBAN - OPHC | 26% Poorly correlated | -5.21% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLBC has been loosely correlated with FNLC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLBC jumps, then FNLC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLBC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PLBC | 100% | -6.04% | ||
FNLC - PLBC | 59% Loosely correlated | -4.36% | ||
PKBK - PLBC | 58% Loosely correlated | -4.20% | ||
BHB - PLBC | 58% Loosely correlated | -6.30% | ||
TMP - PLBC | 58% Loosely correlated | -6.61% | ||
RRBI - PLBC | 57% Loosely correlated | -4.58% | ||
More |