OPMXF
Price
$0.63
Change
+$0.09 (+16.67%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.98B
WLGS
Price
$5.14
Change
+$1.17 (+29.47%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
77.58M
Ad is loading...

OPMXF vs WLGS

Header iconOPMXF vs WLGS Comparison
Open Charts OPMXF vs WLGSBanner chart's image
OPERADORA DE SITES MEXICANOS S A B DE C V
Price$0.63
Change+$0.09 (+16.67%)
Volume$9.92K
Capitalization1.98B
Wang & Lee Group
Price$5.14
Change+$1.17 (+29.47%)
Volume$592.11K
Capitalization77.58M
OPMXF vs WLGS Comparison Chart
Loading...
OPMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OPMXF vs. WLGS commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OPMXF is a Hold and WLGS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (OPMXF: $0.63 vs. WLGS: $5.14)
Brand notoriety: OPMXF and WLGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OPMXF: 64% vs. WLGS: 316%
Market capitalization -- OPMXF: $1.98B vs. WLGS: $77.58M
OPMXF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $1.98B. WLGS’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $77.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $5.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OPMXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWLGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OPMXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WLGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WLGS is a better buy in the long-term than OPMXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OPMXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLGS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OPMXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WLGS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OPMXF is a better buy in the short-term than WLGS.

Price Growth

OPMXF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +12.37% price change this week, while WLGS (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +242.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +4.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

WLGS is expected to report earnings on Apr 20, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+4.42% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OPMXF($1.98B) has a higher market cap than WLGS($77.6M). WLGS has higher P/E ratio than OPMXF: WLGS (257.00) vs OPMXF (59.61). WLGS YTD gains are higher at: 191.218 vs. OPMXF (6.998).
OPMXFWLGSOPMXF / WLGS
Capitalization1.98B77.6M2,553%
EBITDA12.2BN/A-
Gain YTD6.998191.2184%
P/E Ratio59.61257.0023%
Revenue12.9BN/A-
Total Cash3.72BN/A-
Total Debt42.5BN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OPMXFWLGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
54%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
83%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OPMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BABA85.122.69
+3.26%
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
IVZ17.200.33
+1.96%
Invesco Ltd
JELD9.500.15
+1.60%
JELD-WEN Holding
WASH32.830.44
+1.36%
Washington Trust Bancorp
ALLK0.86-0.05
-5.99%
Allakos

OPMXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OPMXF and CTNGY have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OPMXF and CTNGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OPMXF
1D Price
Change %
OPMXF100%
+15.54%
CTNGY - OPMXF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLGS - OPMXF
7%
Poorly correlated
+29.47%
SLND - OPMXF
6%
Poorly correlated
+4.17%
MCDIF - OPMXF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EKIVY - OPMXF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WLGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLGS and AGX have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLGS and AGX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLGS
1D Price
Change %
WLGS100%
+29.47%
AGX - WLGS
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.45%
MTRX - WLGS
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.77%
ACSAF - WLGS
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NVEE - WLGS
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
ACA - WLGS
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
More