OPMXF
Price
$0.99
Change
+$0.02 (+2.06%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.02B
WLGS
Price
$0.22
Change
+$0.01 (+4.76%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
4.59M
Interact to see
Advertisement

OPMXF vs WLGS

Header iconOPMXF vs WLGS Comparison
Open Charts OPMXF vs WLGSBanner chart's image
OPERADORA DE SITES MEXICANOS S A B DE C V
Price$0.99
Change+$0.02 (+2.06%)
Volume$669
Capitalization3.02B
Wang & Lee Group
Price$0.22
Change+$0.01 (+4.76%)
Volume$845.67K
Capitalization4.59M
OPMXF vs WLGS Comparison Chart
Loading...
WLGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OPMXF vs. WLGS commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OPMXF is a Hold and WLGS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (OPMXF: $0.99 vs. WLGS: $0.22)
Brand notoriety: OPMXF and WLGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OPMXF: 1% vs. WLGS: 6%
Market capitalization -- OPMXF: $3.02B vs. WLGS: $4.59M
OPMXF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $3.02B. WLGS’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $4.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OPMXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWLGS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OPMXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WLGS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WLGS is a better buy in the long-term than OPMXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WLGS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WLGS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

OPMXF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +1.23% price change this week, while WLGS (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -0.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

WLGS is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+1.36% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OPMXF($3.02B) has a higher market cap than WLGS($4.59M). OPMXF has higher P/E ratio than WLGS: OPMXF (43.41) vs WLGS (12.80). OPMXF YTD gains are higher at: 68.710 vs. WLGS (-87.724).
OPMXFWLGSOPMXF / WLGS
Capitalization3.02B4.59M65,773%
EBITDA12.5BN/A-
Gain YTD68.710-87.724-78%
P/E Ratio43.4112.80339%
Revenue13.2BN/A-
Total Cash5.9BN/A-
Total Debt42.9BN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WLGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WLGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCBAX14.12N/A
N/A
BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Inv C
MSFHX19.20N/A
N/A
MFS Total Return R3
IEMHX10.54N/A
N/A
Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Eq A
MSJSX17.56N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Global Endurance R6
AVENX12.86N/A
N/A
Avantis® Emerging Markets Equity G

OPMXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OPMXF and CTNGY have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OPMXF and CTNGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OPMXF
1D Price
Change %
OPMXF100%
+2.28%
CTNGY - OPMXF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLGS - OPMXF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
SLND - OPMXF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCDIF - OPMXF
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.08%
EKIVY - OPMXF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WLGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLGS and AGX have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLGS and AGX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLGS
1D Price
Change %
WLGS100%
+1.06%
AGX - WLGS
22%
Poorly correlated
+8.01%
BBCP - WLGS
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
ACSAF - WLGS
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NVEE - WLGS
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
MTZ - WLGS
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
More