ORVMF
Price
$0.39
Change
-$0.01 (-2.50%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
18.04M
PAEKY
Price
$17.62
Change
+$1.96 (+12.52%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
3.25B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ORVMF vs PAEKY

Header iconORVMF vs PAEKY Comparison
Open Charts ORVMF vs PAEKYBanner chart's image
Orvana Minerals
Price$0.39
Change-$0.01 (-2.50%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization18.04M
PT Aneka Tambang TBK
Price$17.62
Change+$1.96 (+12.52%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.25B
ORVMF vs PAEKY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ORVMF vs. PAEKY commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ORVMF is a Hold and PAEKY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ORVMF: $0.39 vs. PAEKY: $17.62)
Brand notoriety: ORVMF and PAEKY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ORVMF: 82% vs. PAEKY: 67%
Market capitalization -- ORVMF: $18.04M vs. PAEKY: $3.25B
ORVMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $18.04M. PAEKY’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ORVMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAEKY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ORVMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAEKY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAEKY is a better buy in the long-term than ORVMF.

Price Growth

ORVMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -5.23% price change this week, while PAEKY (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAEKY is expected to report earnings on Apr 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.00% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAEKY($3.25B) has a higher market cap than ORVMF($18M). PAEKY has higher P/E ratio than ORVMF: PAEKY (12.02) vs ORVMF (4.26). PAEKY YTD gains are higher at: 151.083 vs. ORVMF (142.759). PAEKY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.79T vs. ORVMF (7.59M). PAEKY has higher revenues than ORVMF: PAEKY (47.78T) vs ORVMF (91.4M).
ORVMFPAEKYORVMF / PAEKY
Capitalization18M3.25B1%
EBITDA7.59M5.79T0%
Gain YTD142.759151.08394%
P/E Ratio4.2612.0235%
Revenue91.4M47.78T0%
Total Cash3.52MN/A-
Total Debt20.1MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ORVMF vs PAEKY: Fundamental Ratings
ORVMF
PAEKY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6641
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4934
SMR RATING
1..100
8411
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3535
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9185
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAEKY's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ORVMF (75). This means that PAEKY’s stock grew significantly faster than ORVMF’s over the last 12 months.

PAEKY's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as ORVMF (49). This means that PAEKY’s stock grew similarly to ORVMF’s over the last 12 months.

PAEKY's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ORVMF (84). This means that PAEKY’s stock grew significantly faster than ORVMF’s over the last 12 months.

PAEKY's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as ORVMF (35). This means that PAEKY’s stock grew similarly to ORVMF’s over the last 12 months.

PAEKY's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as ORVMF (91). This means that PAEKY’s stock grew similarly to ORVMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WSTRX51.290.50
+0.98%
Macquarie Science and Technology R
ALPBX12.340.02
+0.15%
ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity I
EZTGX52.27N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Tx-Mgd Growth 1.2 C
ALGAX21.81N/A
N/A
Alger International Opportunities A
RSPMX26.92N/A
N/A
Victory RS Partners Member

ORVMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ORVMF and CYPMF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ORVMF and CYPMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ORVMF
1D Price
Change %
ORVMF100%
-3.32%
CYPMF - ORVMF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGLDF - ORVMF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OMMSF - ORVMF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
OLVRF - ORVMF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PAEKY - ORVMF
4%
Poorly correlated
+5.59%
More

PAEKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAEKY has been loosely correlated with PDLMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAEKY jumps, then PDLMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAEKY
1D Price
Change %
PAEKY100%
+5.59%
PDLMF - PAEKY
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ORVMF - PAEKY
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.32%
OLVRF - PAEKY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORLA - PAEKY
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
ORZCF - PAEKY
-2%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
More