OZ
Price
$77.93
Change
-$2.12 (-2.65%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:21 PM (EDT)
SHMSF
Price
$0.18
Change
+$0.05 (+38.46%)
Updated
Feb 22 closing price
Ad is loading...

OZ vs SHMSF

Header iconOZ vs SHMSF Comparison
Open Charts OZ vs SHMSFBanner chart's image
Belpointe PREP
Price$77.93
Change-$2.12 (-2.65%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Shimao Services Holdings
Price$0.18
Change+$0.05 (+38.46%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
OZ vs SHMSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
OZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OZ vs. SHMSF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OZ is a Hold and SHMSF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (OZ: $80.05 vs. SHMSF: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: OZ and SHMSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OZ: 193% vs. SHMSF: 100%
Market capitalization -- OZ: $225.51M vs. SHMSF: $569.78M
OZ [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $225.51M. SHMSF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $569.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHMSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SHMSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OZ is a better buy in the long-term than SHMSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OZ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • OZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

OZ (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +2.63% price change this week, while SHMSF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

OZ is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-3.11% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHMSF($570M) has a higher market cap than OZ($226M). SHMSF YTD gains are higher at: 38.308 vs. OZ (3.625). SHMSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.36B vs. OZ (-8.24M). SHMSF has more cash in the bank: 5.65B vs. OZ (15.7M). OZ has less debt than SHMSF: OZ (1.41M) vs SHMSF (51.4M). SHMSF has higher revenues than OZ: SHMSF (7.7B) vs OZ (2.16M).
OZSHMSFOZ / SHMSF
Capitalization226M570M40%
EBITDA-8.24M1.36B-1%
Gain YTD3.62538.3089%
P/E RatioN/A6.02-
Revenue2.16M7.7B0%
Total Cash15.7M5.65B0%
Total Debt1.41M51.4M3%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OZSHMSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IKTSY61.040.21
+0.35%
Intertek Group Plc
PPRUY25.00-0.19
-0.75%
Kering SA
SAXPY20.47-0.26
-1.25%
Sampo OYJ
BSRTF12.63-0.24
-1.86%
Bsr Real Estate Invt Tr
LGIQ0.02N/A
-7.74%
LOGIQ INC.

SHMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHMSF has been loosely correlated with EVGPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHMSF jumps, then EVGPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHMSF
1D Price
Change %
SHMSF100%
N/A
EVGPF - SHMSF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LRHC - SHMSF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
OZ - SHMSF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
AWCA - SHMSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HHH - SHMSF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.45%
More