PAAS
Price
$27.46
Change
+$0.28 (+1.03%)
Updated
Apr 15 closing price
Capitalization
5.59B
21 days until earnings call
SLVRF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 15 closing price
Capitalization
66.6M
Ad is loading...

PAAS vs SLVRF

Header iconPAAS vs SLVRF Comparison
Open Charts PAAS vs SLVRFBanner chart's image
Pan American Silver
Price$27.46
Change+$0.28 (+1.03%)
Volume$3.48M
Capitalization5.59B
Silver One Resources
Price$0.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$130.26K
Capitalization66.6M
PAAS vs SLVRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAAS vs. SLVRF commentary
Apr 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAAS is a Buy and SLVRF is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 16, 2025
Stock price -- (PAAS: $27.18 vs. SLVRF: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: PAAS: Notable vs. SLVRF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAAS: 175% vs. SLVRF: 58%
Market capitalization -- PAAS: $5.59B vs. SLVRF: $66.6M
PAAS [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.59B. SLVRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $66.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAAS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLVRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLVRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the long-term than SLVRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAAS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLVRF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAAS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SLVRF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLVRF is a better buy in the short-term than PAAS.

Price Growth

PAAS (@Precious Metals) experienced а +24.28% price change this week, while SLVRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +24.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +13.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+13.00% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($5.59B) has a higher market cap than SLVRF($66.6M). SLVRF YTD gains are higher at: 41.492 vs. PAAS (36.378). PAAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 296M vs. SLVRF (-3.31M). PAAS has higher revenues than SLVRF: PAAS (2.02B) vs SLVRF (0).
PAASSLVRFPAAS / SLVRF
Capitalization5.59B66.6M8,387%
EBITDA296M-3.31M-8,943%
Gain YTD36.37841.49288%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue2.02B0-
Total CashN/A2.73M-
Total DebtN/A0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAAS vs SLVRF: Fundamental Ratings
PAAS
SLVRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1272
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5190
SMR RATING
1..100
8791
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4061
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
38100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAAS's Valuation (17) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SLVRF (40) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to SLVRF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLVRF (90) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLVRF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's SMR Rating (87) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SLVRF (91) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to SLVRF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SLVRF (61) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to SLVRF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLVRF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLVRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAASSLVRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IJAN31.690.14
+0.43%
Innovator Itnl Dvp Pwr Buff ETF™ Jan
IBDT25.080.06
+0.24%
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corp ETF
FCTR30.060.05
+0.17%
First Trust Lunt US Factor Rotation ETF
EWH16.35-0.01
-0.06%
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
SATO13.25-0.36
-2.65%
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Eco ETF

PAAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAAS has been closely correlated with MAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAAS jumps, then MAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAAS
1D Price
Change %
PAAS100%
+1.03%
MAG - PAAS
86%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
HL - PAAS
85%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
AG - PAAS
84%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
AEM - PAAS
82%
Closely correlated
+1.84%
CDE - PAAS
81%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
More

SLVRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLVRF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLVRF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVRF
1D Price
Change %
SLVRF100%
-0.99%
PAAS - SLVRF
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
ISVLF - SLVRF
52%
Loosely correlated
-3.20%
MAG - SLVRF
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
AG - SLVRF
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
SVM - SLVRF
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.30%
More